Published

50 of 2605 published with a draft · mirror synced Oct 24 03:00 UTC
3240468 pc Jun 15, 2026 ataylor Quebec Consumer protection office financial services
headline rewritten 46% of draft length open

Generated

1742 chars

Quebec Consumer Protection Office Announces Krédit Prêt Inc. Guilty Plea for Non-Compliant Credit Rate Calculation

On June 15, 2026, the Quebec Consumer Protection Office announced that Krédit Prêt Inc. pleaded guilty to charges under the Consumer Protection Act (LPC) on December 12, 2025, and March 12, 2026. The company must pay total fines of CAD 12,594. The Consumer Protection Office charged Krédit Prêt Inc. with calculating credit fees at rates higher than permitted by law and imposing "warranty" fees that should have been included in the credit rate calculation. Although the lender advertised an interest rate of 22 percent, the actual credit rate calculated in accordance with legal requirements ranged between 253 percent and 379 percent. The company also acknowledged including contractual penalties of CAD 50 per failed withdrawal attempt in its agreements. The violations occurred in January and February 2023 in Saint-Lin-Laurentides and Longueuil. Krédit Prêt Inc. is headquartered at 1471 Boulevard Jean-Jacques-Bertrand, Cowansville. Under Quebec's Consumer Protection Act, money lenders must hold a permit from the Consumer Protection Office. The act requires specific contract terms, including disclosure of the credit rate with all calculation elements specified. Lenders must also assess consumers' repayment capacity; failure to do so results in loss of contractual credit fees. High-cost credit contracts—those exceeding the Bank of Canada's official discount rate by more than 22 percentage points—require additional specific permits. Lenders offering high-cost credit must calculate consumer debt ratios; ratios exceeding 45 percent create grounds for contract cancellation or obligation reduction. High-cost credit contracts provide consumers a 10-day cancellation period, compared to two days for standard credit agreements.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

793 chars · nid 93234

Quebec Consumer Protection Office Issues CAD$12,594 Fine Against Krédit Prêt Inc. for Excess Interest Charges

On June 15, 2026, the Quebec Consumer Protection Office (CPU) announced that Krédit Prêt Inc. pleaded guilty to charges under the Consumer Protection Act (LPC) on December 12, 2025, and March 12, 2026. The CPU accused the company of charging credit fees calculated at a rate higher than that permitted by law, as well as "madder" fees that should have been included in the credit rate calculation. Thus, while the lender advertised an interest rate of 22 percent, the actual credit rate, calculated according to legal requirements, ranged from 253 percent to 379 percent. The company also acknowledged stating in its contracts, as a penalty, that a CAD$50 fee would be charged for each insufficient funds withdrawal. The company must pay total fines of CAD$12,594 (approximately US$9,002.13)
3240204 gc Jun 15, 2026 prandeo Netherlands News - Dutch Gambling Authority gamblingcompliance
headline rewritten 99% of draft length open

Generated

1904 chars

Netherlands Gambling Authority Issues Warning to Betnation Over Missing Self-Exclusion Registry Checks

On March 2026, the Netherlands Gambling Authority (Kansspelautoriteit, KSA) issued a warning to Smart Gaming, which operates the online gambling platform Betnation, for failing to perform mandatory checks against Cruks, the Dutch national self-exclusion registry also known as Gokstop, between January and March 2026. During this period, a number of players were able to gamble online without the KSA verifying whether they were registered on Cruks. Online gambling operators in the Netherlands are required to check Cruks before allowing player participation. Individuals registered on Cruks are prohibited from accessing legal online gambling, gaming machine halls, and casinos in the Netherlands. The registry currently contains approximately 118,000 registered individuals seeking self-protection against gambling harm. Betnation attributed the failure to a technical error. After discovering the issue, the operator manually reviewed affected players and identified a small group for whom it could not definitively determine whether they were registered on Cruks during the incident period. Some of these players gambled during this timeframe, and one player was confirmed to have been registered on Cruks while still accessing gambling services. The KSA emphasised the severity of the breach, noting that players who self-exclude must be able to rely on that protection from licensed operators. Betnation self-reported the incident to the KSA and implemented remedial measures, including financially compensating affected players and exploring additional support options such as counselling or responsible gambling courses in partnership with relevant organisations. Given these corrective actions, the KSA opted to issue a warning rather than pursue stricter enforcement. The KSA stated it expects all operators to execute Cruks checks correctly and will continue monitoring compliance closely.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1887 chars · nid 51498

Dutch gambling authority issues warning to Betnation over self-exclusion measures

On June 15 2026, the Netherlands Gambling Authority (KSA) issued a warning to Smart Gaming, which operates the online gambling platform Betnation, for failing to perform mandatory checks against Cruks, the Dutch national self-exclusion registry also known as Gokstop, between January and March 2026. During this period, a number of players were able to gamble online without the KSA verifying whether they were registered on Cruks. Online gambling operators in the Netherlands are required to check Cruks before allowing player participation. Individuals registered on Cruks are prohibited from accessing legal online gambling, gaming machine halls, and casinos in the Netherlands. The registry currently contains approximately 118,000 registered individuals seeking self-protection against gambling harm. Betnation attributed the failure to a technical error. After discovering the issue, the operator manually reviewed affected players and identified a small group for whom it could not definitively determine whether they were registered on Cruks during the incident period. Some of these players gambled during this timeframe, and one player was confirmed to have been registered on Cruks while still accessing gambling services. The KSA emphasised the severity of the breach, noting that players who self-exclude must be able to rely on that protection from licensed operators. Betnation self-reported the incident to the KSA and implemented remedial measures, including financially compensating affected players and exploring additional support options such as counselling or responsible gambling courses in partnership with relevant organisations. Given these corrective actions, the KSA opted to issue a warning rather than pursue stricter enforcement. The KSA stated it expects all operators to execute Cruks checks correctly and will continue monitoring compliance closely.
3240189 pc Jun 15, 2026 adavies
draft failed open

Generated

Draft failed: All content sources failed: HTTP 202

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

703 chars · nid 93229

European Council Publishes Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1333 Amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP

On June 15, 2026, the European Council published Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1333, amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Decision introduces a new temporary derogation from the asset freeze and the prohibition on making funds or economic resources available to a designated entity, allowing for the wind-down of operations, contracts and other agreements concluded with that entity and for industry purchases of critical components manufactured by that entity. The regulation enters into force immediately.
3240185 pc Jun 15, 2026 adavies
draft failed open

Generated

Draft failed: All content sources failed: HTTP 202

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

898 chars · nid 93228

European Council Publishes Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1336 Amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014

On June 15, 2026, the European Council published Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1336, amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in the Official Journal of the European Union. The regulation introduces a new paragraph in Article 6b providing that competent authorities of a member state may authorise the release of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the entity listed under entry number 692 under the heading 'Entities' in Annex I to this regulation, or the making available of certain funds or economic resources to that entity, under such conditions as they deem appropriate and after having determined that such funds or economic resources are strictly necessary for certain purposes. The regulation enters into force immediately.
3238548 pc Jun 15, 2026 kgurnani Australia Australian Securities and Investments Comission horizon scanning
headline rewritten 73% of draft length open

Generated

1868 chars

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Secures ASX Admission of Misleading CHESS Replacement Project Conduct

On June 26, 2026, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced that ASX Limited (ASX) admitted to making misleading statements regarding its CHESS replacement project. ASX's February 10, 2022 market announcement stating the project was "progressing well" was misleading and exposed market participants to financial harm risk. ASX admitted that as of December 21, 2021, the CHESS replacement project was not on its critical path to go-live in April 2023 and was internally classified "red," indicating significant unresolved issues or risks. Industry test environments had opened with reduced scope and performance, while timelines for incomplete work had been pushed out. Despite these conditions, ASX told the market the project was progressing well. Six weeks later, on March 28, 2022, ASX announced a strong likelihood of project delay. ASX subsequently paused the project and derecognised approximately $245–255 million in pre-tax project costs. ASX contravened sections 12DA and 12DB(1)(a) and (e) of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth). ASIC and ASX will ask the Federal Court to impose a penalty of $20.5 million and order ASX to pay $3 million towards ASIC's costs. ASIC Chair Sarah Court said ASX's statement risked undermining confidence in Australia's financial markets, emphasising that accurate and timely disclosures are fundamental to maintaining trust in critical market infrastructure. Since these events, ASIC obtained commitments from ASX to strengthen oversight, governance, and delivery of the CHESS replacement program. The CHESS replacement project aimed to replace the Clearing House Electronic Subregister System with a new distributed ledger technology system. Release 1 went live on April 20, 2026. A Federal Court hearing on final orders and penalty is scheduled for July 1, 2026.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1359 chars · nid 93225

Federal Court of Australia Issues AU$20.5 Million Penalty on ASX for Misleading Clearing House Electronic Subregister System Replacement Project Conduct

On June 26, 2026, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced that ASX Limited (ASX) admitted to making misleading statements regarding its Clearing House Electronic Subregister System (CHESS) replacement project. ASX's February 10, 2022 market announcement stating the project was "progressing well" was misleading and exposed market participants to financial harm risk. ASX admitted that as of December 21, 2021, the CHESS replacement project was not on its critical path to go-live in April 2023 and was internally classified "red," indicating significant unresolved issues or risks. Industry test environments had opened with reduced scope and performance, while timelines for incomplete work had been pushed out. Despite these conditions, ASX told the market the project was progressing well. Six weeks later, on March 28, 2022, ASX announced a strong likelihood of project delay. ASX subsequently paused the project and derecognised approximately $245–255 million in pre-tax project costs. ASX contravened sections 12DA and 12DB(1)(a) and (e) of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 . ASIC and ASX will ask the Federal Court to impose a penalty of $20.5 million and order ASX to pay $3 million towards ASIC's costs. A Federal Court hearing on final orders and penalty is scheduled for July 1, 2026.
3243276 gc Jun 15, 2026 prandeo Sweden Regulator - news gamblingcompliance
headline rewritten 65% of draft length open

Generated

1682 chars

Sweden's Administrative Court Upholds and Overturns Gambling Regulator Duty of Care Sanctions

On June 15, 2026, Sweden's Administrative Court (Förvaltningsrätten) issued judgments in two cases concerning operators' duty of care obligations under Swedish gambling law. In the first case, the Administrative Court upheld the Swedish Gambling Authority (Spelinspektionen) decision against Videoslots Ltd. The Spelinspektionen had issued a warning and imposed a sanction of 12 million Swedish kronor on April 16, 2025, for breaches of the duty of care requirement. The Administrative Court agreed with the Spelinspektionen's assessment, finding that Videoslots Ltd had clearly and distinctly violated its duty of care obligations regarding the majority of reviewed players. The court rejected the operator's appeal and upheld both the warning and financial sanction. In the second case, the Administrative Court overturned the Spelinspektionen decision against Roar Vegas Ltd. The Spelinspektionen had issued a remark and imposed a sanction of 8 million Swedish kronor on March 24, 2025, for duty of care breaches. The Administrative Court determined that Roar Vegas Ltd had not clearly and distinctly violated its duty of care obligations and therefore annulled the Spelinspektionen's decision. These judgments provide clarity on how Swedish courts interpret and apply the duty of care standard in gambling regulation. The outcomes demonstrate that operators must demonstrate clear and distinct breaches of duty of care obligations for sanctions to be upheld on appeal. The cases are significant for operators and the Spelinspektionen in understanding the evidentiary threshold required to establish violations and the scope of judicial review in gambling enforcement matters.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1085 chars · nid 51508

Swedish court confirms Videoslots breached gambling duty of care

On June 15, 2026, Sweden's Administrative Court (Förvaltningsrätten) upheld a decision of the Swedish Gambling Authority (Spelinspektionen) against Videoslots Ltd concerning breaches of the operator's duty of care obligations under the Gambling Act. The Spelinspektionen had issued Videoslots Ltd with a warning and an administrative sanction fee of SEK 12m on April 16, 2025, following findings that the operator had failed to meet its duty of care obligations towards certain customers. The Administrative Court agreed with the regulator's assessment regarding the majority of the players reviewed and concluded that Videoslots Ltd had clearly and distinctly breached its duty of care obligations in relation to those players. The court therefore found that the warning and sanction fee were justified and dismissed the operator's appeal. The judgment confirms the Swedish Gambling Authority's approach to enforcing duty of care requirements and highlights the expectation that licensed operators take timely and effective measures when signs of excessive gambling are identified.
3237221 pc Jun 15, 2026 tojuri Belgium Financial Services and Markets Authority financial services
headline rewritten 55% of draft length open

Generated

1713 chars

Belgium's Financial Services and Markets Authority Extends Banker's Oath to 30,000 Bankers

On June 12, 2026, the Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) announced that the banker's oath will extend to approximately 30,000 bankers from July 15, 2026. The banker's oath is a disciplinary regime that establishes personal liability for bankers, requiring them to act with integrity and professionalism while treating clients honestly and fairly. The FSMA introduced the banker's oath for certain categories of bankers in early 2025. The expansion effective July 15, 2026, will broaden the regime to encompass all targeted bankers within Belgium's financial services sector. The oath creates a framework of personal accountability, ensuring that individual bankers comply with core standards of conduct and ethical behaviour. By establishing personal liability, the regime aims to strengthen professional standards across the banking industry and enhance consumer protection through individual accountability rather than relying solely on institutional compliance measures. The FSMA has provided clarification on key obligations under the extended banker's oath regime to support implementation. Bankers subject to the oath must understand their personal responsibilities and the conduct standards they must maintain. The extension represents a significant shift in Belgium's regulatory approach to banking conduct, affecting a substantial portion of the country's banking workforce. Financial institutions and their employees should review the FSMA's guidance on the banker's oath to ensure compliance ahead of the July 15, 2026, effective date. Additional details regarding specific obligations and implementation requirements are available through the FSMA's French and Dutch language resources.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

941 chars · nid 93224

Belgium's Financial Services and Markets Authority Issues Reminder on Extension of Banking Oath

On June 12, 2026, the Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) issued a reminder on the application and extension of the Banking Oath. From July 15, 2026, the banking oath will apply to persons active within banking and investment services, including agents of a credit institution. Bankers subject to the banking oath must: Take the oath within six months of the entry into force of the regulation or their effective commencement of duties. Act with honesty and integrity, as well as with competence and professionalism, and consider their clients' interests and treat them fairly. The ethical rules have been specified by royal decree . Before being hired, provide proof of no professional ban. Failure to comply with any of the aforementioned obligations (swearing an oath and adhering to ethical rules) may result in disciplinary action by the FSMA, including a ban on practising the profession for up to three years.
3237173 pc Jun 15, 2026 tojuri Belgium House of Representatives horizon scanning
draft failed open

Generated

Draft failed: LLM generation produced empty content

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

847 chars · nid 93223

Bill Transposing Directive (EU) 2024/1226 Submitted to Belgian Parliament

A draft law transposing Directive (EU) 2024/1226 on the definition of criminal offences and penalties for breaches on Union restrictive measures has been submitted to the Belgian parliament. The bill aims to implement the provisions of Directive (EU) 2024/1226 and to establish a legal framework clarifying criminal penalties and enforcement mechanisms for breaches of EU restrictive measures in Belgium. The bill aims to adapt existing legislation and establish a coherent national framework, in line with European minimum standards on criminalisation and sanctions. It provides for a general reform of the legal framework applicable to restrictive measures, paying particular attention to the need to provide for uniform, effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, as well as to improving coordination between the relevant authorities.
3241434 pc Jun 15, 2026 arahman Belarus Operational and Analytical Center under the President of the Republic of Belarus - Аператыўна-аналітычны цэнтр пры Прэзідэнце Рэспублікі Беларусь horizon scanning
headline kept 64% of draft length open

Generated

1851 chars

Belarus Operational and Analytical Center Issues Electronic Signature and Digital Certificate Management Regulations

On May 29, 2026, the Operational and Analytical Center under the President of the Republic of Belarus (OAC) issued Order No. 102 implementing the Law of the Republic of Belarus of December 28, 2009, No. 113-Z "On Electronic Document and Electronic Digital Signature." The order establishes three key regulatory instruments governing electronic signature infrastructure in Belarus. The OAC approved an instruction detailing procedures for verifying ownership of private electronic digital signature keys and issuing attribute certificates. It also established the Regulations on the State System for Managing Public Keys for Electronic Digital Signature Verification in the Republic of Belarus, which creates a centralized framework for managing digital signature verification infrastructure. Additionally, the OAC approved an instruction outlining accreditation procedures within the State System for Managing Public Keys for Electronic Digital Signature Verification in the Republic of Belarus, establishing requirements for entities seeking to participate in the digital signature ecosystem. These regulations address critical aspects of Belarus's digital infrastructure by standardizing processes for electronic signature authentication, certificate issuance, and accreditation of participating organizations. The framework supports the implementation of the 2009 electronic signature law and enhances the security and reliability of digital transactions across government and private sectors. Order No. 102 enters into force one month following its official publication. Organizations and service providers involved in electronic signature verification, certificate management, and digital authentication must ensure compliance with the newly established procedures and accreditation requirements outlined in the three accompanying instruments.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1190 chars · nid 93250

Belarus Operational and Analytical Center Issues Electronic Signature and Digital Certificate Management Regulations

On June 15, 2026, the Operational and Analytical Centre under the President of the Republic of Belarus (OAC) announced the approval of Order No. 102, which implements the Law of the Republic of Belarus of December 28, 2009, No. 113-Z "On Electronic Document and Electronic Digital Signature." The order establishes three key regulatory instruments governing electronic signature infrastructure in Belarus. The OAC approved an instruction detailing procedures for verifying ownership of private electronic digital signature keys and issuing attribute certificates. It also established the Regulations on the State System for Managing Public Keys for Electronic Digital Signature Verification in the Republic of Belarus, which creates a centralised framework for managing digital signature verification infrastructure. Additionally, the OAC approved an instruction outlining accreditation procedures within the State System for Managing Public Keys for Electronic Digital Signature Verification in the Republic of Belarus, establishing requirements for entities seeking to participate in the digital signature ecosystem. This order comes into force one month after its official publication.
3238547 pc Jun 15, 2026 kgurnani Australia Australian Securities and Investments Comission horizon scanning
headline kept 89% of draft length open

Generated

2295 chars

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Invites Feedback on Pre-Hedging Regulatory Guidance

On June 24, 2026, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released Consultation Paper 389 Proposed Regulatory Guide on Pre-Hedging, seeking industry feedback on draft guidance addressing pre-hedging practices by market participants. The proposed regulatory guide aligns Australia's regulatory approach with international standards developed by the International Organization of Securities Commission (IOSCO), building on IOSCO's Final Report on Pre-Hedging published in November 2025 and ASIC's previous February 1, 2024 open letter to market participant chief executives. The draft guidance clarifies how existing legal obligations apply to pre-hedging activities, helps market participants assess when pre-hedging is appropriate, and highlights practices that manage conduct risk and maintain market integrity. Pre-hedging involves market participants trading in anticipation of client transactions to manage risks associated with primary capital raisings and secondary market transactions. While pre-hedging can support liquidity and efficient execution, it raises conflicts of interest and market abuse risks when participants trade while possessing confidential information about anticipated client transactions. The guidance applies to Australian financial services (AFS) licensees and other entities undertaking pre-hedging, and provides guidance on conduct clients should expect from these entities. The proposed regulatory guide does not introduce new legal requirements. ASIC notes it has previously taken enforcement action against entities for poor pre-hedging practices, including ordering Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) to pay $135 million in December 2025 for misconduct relating to a $14 billion government bond transaction, and ordering Westpac Banking Corporation to pay $9.9 million in January 2024 for unconscionable conduct in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction. The consultation closes at 5:00pm Australian Eastern Standard Time on July 27, 2026. ASIC intends to publish the final regulatory guide in the fourth quarter of 2026 following consideration of consultation feedback. Submissions should address whether the final guide should include examples of observed better practices to support implementation.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

2043 chars · nid 93221

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Invites Feedback on Pre-Hedging Regulatory Guidance

On June 24, 2026, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released Consultation Paper 389 Proposed Regulatory Guide on Pre-Hedging, seeking industry feedback on draft guidance addressing pre-hedging practices by market participants. The guide is intended to replace ASIC's 2024 CEO letter on pre-hedging and align Australia with the final recommendations issued by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO). The draft guide requires firms undertaking pre-hedging to have: Formal policies and procedures: Firms should maintain documented policies governing when pre-hedging may be used, who can approve it, acceptable execution strategies, escalation procedures for higher-risk transactions. Client disclosure: Firms should clearly disclose that pre-hedging may occur, the circumstances in which it may occur, potential impacts on pricing and execution, risks to clients arising from the practice. Client consent: Where practical, ASIC expects firms to obtain explicit and informed client consent, transaction-specific consent for larger or more complex trades. Management of confidential information: Because pre-hedging involves trading while possessing confidential knowledge of a future client order, firms must have information barriers, access restrictions, surveillance controls, procedures to prevent misuse of client information. Conflicts-of-interest controls: ASIC expects firms to identify and manage conflicts between the firm's trading interests, the client's execution interests. Monitoring and surveillance: Firms should maintain trade surveillance, communications monitoring, compliance oversight, senior management supervision. The consultation closes at 5:00pm Australian Eastern Standard Time on July 27, 2026. ASIC intends to publish the final regulatory guide in the fourth quarter of 2026 following consideration of consultation feedback. Submissions should address whether the final guide should include examples of observed better practices to support implementation.
3240833 pc Jun 15, 2026 msolomon Czech Republic Czech National Bank financial services
headline rewritten 73% of draft length open

Generated

1976 chars

Czech National Bank Alerts to End of Crypto-Assets Transition Period on July 1, 2026

On June 15, 2026, the Czech National Bank (CNB) issued a notice warning that the transition period for providing crypto-asset services under the European Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) will end on July 1, 2026. After this date, only entities holding a crypto-asset service provider (CASP) authorisation from the CNB or the competent authority of another EU member state may provide crypto-asset services in the EU. Banks, securities traders, and other financial institutions may continue offering these services if they properly notify the CNB or another supervisory authority. The CNB emphasised that most entities previously providing crypto-asset services cannot continue operating under the transition regime because they failed to meet the eligibility conditions. Providing crypto-asset services without CASP authorisation or notification after July 1, 2026 constitutes a breach of MiCA and exposes providers to administrative penalties and corrective measures, including fines exceeding 100 million Czech koruna. Providers currently operating under the transition regime must cease activities by July 1, 2026 if they lack the required authorisation. They must transfer customer crypto-assets and funds to authorised service providers or customer-controlled self-hosted wallets, ensure proper settlement of customer funds, and continue fulfilling anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing obligations until operations end. The CNB recommends providers implement a wind-down plan and notify customers in advance. Consumers and investors should verify provider authorisation through the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) register and the CNB's list before using services. The CNB recommends consumers confirm they are dealing with an authorised EU-based entity, as customer protections apply only to such entities. Individuals suspecting unauthorised crypto-asset service provision after July 1, 2026 may submit reports to the CNB.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1451 chars · nid 93244

Czech National Bank Issues Reminder on End of Transitional Period under MiCA

On June 15, 2026, the Czech National Bank (CNB) issues a reminder that the transitional period for the provision of services related to crypto-assets under the Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 - Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA), will end on July 1, 2026. After July 1, 2026, only those with a Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) authorisation granted by the CNB or the relevant supervisory authority in another EU Member State may provide crypto asset-related services in the EU under MiCA. The CNB highlights that anyone still providing services related to crypto-assets to customers in the Czech Republic under the transitional regime and without the necessary authorisation by July 1, 2026, is obliged to terminate their activities as well as the CNB recommending they consider the following: Ensure the transfer of crypto-assets and customer funds to an authorised provider of crypto-asset-related services or to self-hosted wallets under the customer's control, or ensure the proper settlement of customer funds. Continue to fulfill obligations under anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing regulations until the termination of the activity. Adopt and implement a wind-down plan as of July 1, 2026, including a schedule for informing clients and transferring their assets. At the request of the CNB, provide information regarding the settlement process, especially if it concerns a significant exposure to clients in the Czech Republic.
3238514 pc Jun 15, 2026 adavies European Union Official Gazette horizon scanning
headline rewritten 46% of draft length open

Generated

2145 chars

European Union Commission Publishes Delegated Regulation Establishing Reduced Content Requirements for Follow-on and Growth Issuance Prospectuses

On June 15, 2026, the European Commission published Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/773, which amends Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/980 to establish reduced content requirements and standardised formats for two new short-form prospectuses: the EU Follow-on prospectus and the EU Growth issuance prospectus. The regulation implements requirements introduced by Regulation (EU) 2024/2809, which aimed to make public capital markets in the European Union more attractive for companies and facilitate capital access for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The EU Follow-on prospectus applies to secondary issuances by companies already listed on regulated markets or SME growth markets, while the EU Growth issuance prospectus targets SMEs and companies listed or seeking listing on SME growth markets. The delegated regulation establishes significantly streamlined disclosure requirements compared to existing simplified prospectus regimes, which expire on March 5, 2026. It specifies different content requirements for equity and non-equity securities, with further distinctions between retail and wholesale investors for non-equity offerings. The regulation mandates standardised formats and sequences for prospectuses, with risk factors appearing prominently to enhance investor protection. For non-equity securities, issuers may prepare prospectuses as single documents or separate registration documents and securities notes. Base prospectuses receive flexible formatting provisions to maintain efficiency. The regulation introduces provisions for European Green Bond factsheets, classifying such information as Category C for base prospectus purposes under Regulation (EU) 2023/2631. The regulation entered into force on the third day following publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and applies directly across all member states. Issuers, offerors, and competent authorities must implement these requirements when processing prospectuses under the new regimes. **Reference:** EUR-Lex, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/773 of 4 March 2026, Official Journal L 2026/773, 15 June 2026

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

984 chars · nid 93216

European Commission Publishes Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/773 Establishing Reduced Content Requirements for Follow-on and Growth Issuance Prospectuses

On June 15, 2026, the European Commission published Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/773, which amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/980 in the Official Journal of the European Union. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/980 has been amended to establish reduced content requirements and standardised formats for two new short-form prospectuses: The EU Follow-on prospectus. The EU Growth issuance prospectus. The regulation implements requirements introduced by Regulation (EU) 2024/2809 , which aims to make public capital markets in the European Union more attractive for companies and facilitate capital access for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Additionally, the delegated regulation establishes significantly streamlined disclosure requirements compared to existing simplified prospectus regimes, which expire on March 5, 2026. The delegated regulation enters into force on June 18, 2026, three days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
3238518 pc Jun 15, 2026 adavies European Union Official Gazette horizon scanning
headline rewritten 63% of draft length open

Generated

2132 chars

European Union Commission Publishes Implementing Technical Standards for Insider List Formats

On June 12, 2026, the European Commission published Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1291, which establishes implementing technical standards for the format of insider lists under the Market Abuse Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 596/2014). The regulation repeals Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1210 and introduces a revised framework for how entities maintain and update insider lists. The regulation applies to issuers, emission allowance market participants, auction platforms, auctioneers, auction monitors, and any persons acting on their behalf who are required to maintain lists of individuals with access to inside information. The new standards introduce an "alleviated format" previously applicable only to certain small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) growth market issuers, now extending it to all insider lists to reduce administrative burden. The regulation establishes two primary templates: Template 1 for event-based sections identifying specific pieces of inside information with details on when individuals obtained and ceased access, and Template 2 for permanent insiders who have access to all inside information at all times. For SME growth market issuers, Template 3 applies, listing only those with regular access to inside information. The regulation requires entities to maintain insider lists in electronic form ensuring restricted access, accuracy, and confidentiality, with competent authorities specifying transmission methods. Personal data retention is limited to five years after an individual ceases to be on the insider list. The regulation respects fundamental rights under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and complies with the General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679). The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) conducted public consultations on the draft standards and consulted its Securities Markets Stakeholder Group. The regulation enters into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and is binding and directly applicable across all member states.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1352 chars · nid 93215

European Union Commission Publishes Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1291 on Insider List Formats

On June 15, 2026, the European Commission published Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1291 laying down implementing technical standards for the format of insider lists under Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 (Market Abuse Regulation – MAR), in the Official Journal of the European Union. The regulation repeals Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1210 and introduces a revised framework for how entities maintain and update insider lists. The regulation applies to issuers, emission allowance market participants, auction platforms, auctioneers, auction monitors, and any persons acting on their behalf who are required to maintain lists of individuals with access to inside information. The new standards introduce an "alleviated format" previously applicable only to certain small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) growth market issuers, now extending it to all insider lists to reduce administrative burden. The regulation establishes two primary templates: Template 1 for event-based sections identifying specific pieces of inside information with details on when individuals obtained and ceased access. Template 2 for permanent insiders who have access to all inside information at all times. For SME growth market issuers. The regulation enters into force on July 5, 2026, 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,
3238517 pc Jun 15, 2026 adavies European Union Official Gazette horizon scanning
headline rewritten 40% of draft length open

Generated

2067 chars

European Union Suspends Derivative Trading Obligation for Four Financial Counterparties on United Kingdom Venues

On June 12, 2026, the European Commission adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1288, which suspends the derivative trading obligation for specified financial counterparties under Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 (Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation). The regulation entered into force on June 18, 2026. The suspension applies to four financial counterparties: BNP Paribas SA, Crédit Agricole CIB, Deutsche Bank AG, and Société Générale SA. These institutions may now trade derivatives subject to the trading obligation on United Kingdom trading venues without complying with the requirement to use only regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities (MTFs), organised trading facilities (OTFs), or recognised equivalent third-country venues. The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) and Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) requested the suspension, demonstrating that these counterparties regularly act as market makers in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives and regularly receive requests for quotes from non-European Economic Area (non-EEA) counterparties without active membership on EEA trading venues. Additionally, BNP Paribas SA received a separate suspension for credit default swaps on dealer-to-dealer venues in the United Kingdom, where it intends to trade with market-making counterparties that lack active membership on EEA dealer-to-dealer venues. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) concurred with the assessment on October 9, 2025. The Commission will review the suspension every five years, with competent authorities required to provide updated evidence six months before each review. Competent authorities must immediately notify the Commission if the conditions for suspension are no longer met. The Commission may revoke the suspension if grounds no longer apply, following notification to the relevant competent authority and allowing six weeks for response. REFERENCES: EUR-Lex: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1288 of 12 June 2026 http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2026/1288/oj

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

836 chars · nid 93214

European Commission Publishes Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1288 Suspending the Derivative Trading Obligation for Certain Financial Counterparties

On June 15, 2026, the European Commission published Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1288, which suspends the derivative trading obligation for specified financial counterparties under Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 (Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation). The suspension applies to four financial counterparties: BNP Paribas SA, Crédit Agricole CIB, Deutsche Bank AG, and Société Générale SA. These institutions may now trade derivatives subject to the trading obligation on United Kingdom trading venues without complying with the requirement to use only regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities (MTFs), organised trading facilities (OTFs), or recognised equivalent third-country venues. The Regulation enters into force on June 18, 2026, three days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
3238519 pc Jun 15, 2026 adavies European Union Official Gazette horizon scanning
headline rewritten 34% of draft length open

Generated

1821 chars

European Union Council Amends Restrictive Measures Decision Concerning Libya Situation

On June 12, 2026, the Council of the European Union adopted Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1334, amending Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya. The amendment implements measures following the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) adoption of Resolution 2819 on April 14, 2026. The decision modifies travel restrictions and asset freeze provisions applicable to designated persons and entities. Article 8 of the original decision has been amended to incorporate travel restriction criteria from UNSC Resolution 2819 (2026), requiring member states to prevent entry into or transit through their territories of persons designated by the Security Council or the relevant committee. Article 9 has been updated to reflect asset freeze measures, including funds, financial assets, and economic resources owned or controlled by designated persons and entities. Significantly, the amendment introduces new provisions governing frozen cash reserves belonging to the Libyan Investment Authority, listed as entry number 1 in Annex VI. Member states may now authorise the use of frozen cash reserves for low-risk time deposits or fixed income instruments, subject to committee approval and consultation with the Government of Libya. Additionally, the decision permits the transfer of frozen funds between custodial banks or financial institutions acting as global custodians within the same jurisdiction, provided assets remain frozen and maintain their form and value throughout the transfer. Member states must notify the committee of such transfers and inform other member states and the Commission within two weeks of granting authorisation. The decision entered into force on June 15, 2026, following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

619 chars · nid 93212

European Council Publishes Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1334 on Restrictive Measures Concerning Libya

On June 15, 2026, the European Council published Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1334, amending Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya, in the Official Journal of the European Union. The amendment implements measures following the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) adoption of Resolution 2819 on April 14, 2026. The decision modifies travel restrictions and asset freeze provisions applicable to designated persons and entities. The decision enters into force on June 16, 2026, one day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
3238513 pc Jun 15, 2026 adavies European Union Official Gazette horizon scanning
headline rewritten 59% of draft length open

Generated

1937 chars

European Union Council Amends Restrictive Measures Regulation Concerning Libya Situation

On June 12, 2026, the Council of the European Union adopted Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1332, amending Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya. The regulation entered into force on June 15, 2026, following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ). The amendment implements changes required by United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2819, adopted on April 14, 2026. The UNSC resolution introduces amendments to listing criteria for those subject to restrictive measures and modifies the scope of measures imposed on the Libyan Investment Authority. The regulation amends Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 to include natural or legal persons, entities and bodies designated under paragraph 19 of UNSC Resolution 2819 (2026). Additionally, the regulation modifies Article 11a to permit the use of frozen cash reserves belonging to the Libyan Investment Authority for low-risk time deposits or fixed income instruments, subject to Sanctions Committee approval and consultation with the Government of Libya, in accordance with paragraphs 14 of UNSC Resolution 2819 (2026). The regulation introduces a new Article 11b, authorising the transfer of certain frozen funds or economic resources belonging to the Libyan Investment Authority between custodial banks or financial institutions acting as global custodians within the same jurisdiction. Such transfers require Sanctions Committee approval under paragraph 15 of UNSC Resolution 2819 (2026), with assets remaining frozen throughout and upon completion of transfer. Member States must notify other Member States and the European Commission of any authorisation granted within two weeks. REFERENCES: Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1332 of 12 June 2026: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1332/oj Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1334 of 15 June 2026: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2026/1334/oj

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1151 chars · nid 93210

European Council Publishes Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1332 on Restrictive Measures Concerning Libya

On June 15, 2026, the European Council Published Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1332, amending Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya, in the Official Journal of the European Union/ The amendments implement changes required by United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2819 , adopted on April 14, 2026. The UNSC resolution introduces amendments to listing criteria for those subject to restrictive measures and modifies the scope of measures imposed on the Libyan Investment Authority. Specifically, the regulation amends Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 to include natural or legal persons, entities and bodies designated under paragraph 19 of UNSC Resolution 2819 (2026). Additionally, the regulation modifies Article 11a to permit the use of frozen cash reserves belonging to the Libyan Investment Authority for low-risk time deposits or fixed income instruments, subject to Sanctions Committee approval and consultation with the Government of Libya. The Regulation enters into force on June 16, 2026, one day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union
3235853 pc Jun 12, 2026 alapetina Oregon Oregon Bankers Association financial services
headline rewritten 89% of draft length open

Generated

1826 chars

Oregon Division of Financial Regulation Issues Bulletin on Buy Now, Pay Later Licensing Requirements

On June 2026, the Oregon Division of Financial Regulation (DFR), part of the Department of Consumer and Business Services, issued Bulletin No. DFR 2026-X clarifying licensing requirements for non-bank lenders offering buy now, pay later (BNPL) products and BNPL service providers operating in Oregon. The bulletin establishes that non-bank BNPL lenders and service providers must obtain either a payday license or consumer finance license through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS) before transacting business in Oregon, regardless of whether the BNPL product is structured as non-recourse, carries no fees or interest at the point of sale, or involves late fees. The licensing requirement depends on the loan's repayment term. BNPL loans with repayment terms of 60 days or less fall under Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) chapter 725A payday lending requirements. BNPL loans with periodic payments and terms longer than 60 days fall under ORS chapter 725 consumer finance licensing requirements. Both chapters apply to loans under $50,000. The DFR clarifies that BNPL loans do not qualify as "purchase money loans" and therefore are subject to licensing requirements. The bulletin defines key terms using Webster's Third International Dictionary and Oregon court precedent, establishing that BNPL loans constitute "loans" requiring repayment at a future date. Additionally, BNPL service providers functioning as brokers, facilitators, or agents must obtain appropriate licenses. The bulletin confirms that non-recourse loan structures do not exempt BNPL lenders from Oregon licensing requirements. The bulletin became effective upon publication in June 2026. Non-bank BNPL lenders and service providers can apply for Oregon payday and consumer finance licenses through the NMLS using links provided by the DFR.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1632 chars · nid 93208

Oregon Division of Financial Regulation Issues Proposed Bulletin on Buy Now Pay Later Licensing Requirements

On June 2026, the Oregon Division of Financial Regulation (DFR) issued a proposed bulletin regarding Oregon consumer finance and payday licensing requirements. The proposed bulletin reminds nonbank lenders offering Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) products and BNPL service providers that they must use the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS) to obtain a payday and/or a consumer finance license based on the length of time the borrower is required to repay the loan before transacting business in Oregon. This is regardless of whether the BNPL is described as a nonrecourse loan or does not include fees, interest, or other charges at the time of the initial purchase. According to the proposed bulletin, BNPL nonbank lenders are required to obtain a consumer finance license if the loan, a loan, or line of credit has periodic payments and terms longer than 60 days, regardless of whether the loan or line of credit is secured by personal or real property. Pursuant to ORS 725.045(1)(a) , the consumer finance licensing requirements apply to brokers, facilitators, and agents of BNPL nonbank lenders. BNPL nonbank lenders are required to satisfy the conditions contained in ORS chapter 725A governing payday loans if the loan is for $50,000 or less, and it has repayment terms of less than 60 days or is payable upon demand within 60 days. Pursuant to ORS 725A.020(1)(b) , the payday licensing requirements apply to brokers, facilitators, and agents of BNPL nonbank payday lenders. Public comment will be accepted for 30 days and must be received by July 13, 2026. If adopted, the bulletin will take effect upon publication.
3238006 pc Jun 12, 2026 ataylor Quebec Consumer protection office financial services
headline rewritten 87% of draft length open

Generated

1765 chars

Quebec Consumer Protection Office Gains New Powers to Combat Identity Theft and Fraudulent Advertising

On June 13, 2026, Quebec's Consumer Protection Office (OPC) announced the adoption of Bill 24, the Act to Protect Consumers Against Misleading or Fraudulent Use of a Person's Identity or Image. The legislation introduces new enforcement mechanisms to address identity theft and associated fraudulent advertising more rapidly and effectively. The act establishes a collaborative framework between the OPC and the Financial Markets Authority (AMF) to coordinate intervention against identity and image misuse. A key innovation is the creation of new order-making powers for the presidents of both the OPC and the AMF, enabling them to issue orders—equivalent to court orders—requiring individuals or enterprises to cease unauthorised use of a person's identity or image in fraudulent advertising and to destroy the image. Non-compliance with such orders can be filed with the Superior Court, potentially resulting in contempt of court charges and imprisonment. The legislation streamlines the complaint process for victims. Both individuals whose identities have been misused and consumers defrauded by such schemes can file complaints with the OPC, which will be treated as priority matters. When financial products are involved, the OPC will coordinate with the AMF. This approach addresses the growing sophistication of fraud tactics, particularly deepfakes and artificial intelligence-generated content exploiting public figures' images without consent to promote counterfeit products. The act aims to eliminate lengthy and costly judicial proceedings for victims while preventing future consumers from falling victim to fraudulent schemes. The legislation responds to evolving fraud tactics enabled by social media proliferation and technological advancement.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1542 chars · nid 93235

Quebec Enacts Bill 24: Act to Protect Consumer Against the Misleading or Fraudulent Use of a Person's Identity or Image

On June 13, 2026, Quebec's Consumer Protection Office (OPC) announced the adoption of Bill 24, the Act to Protect Consumers Against Misleading or Fraudulent Use of a Person's Identity or Image . The legislation introduces new enforcement mechanisms to address identity theft and associated fraudulent advertising more rapidly and effectively by establishing a collaborative framework between the OPC and the Financial Markets Authority (AMF). The new law will allow for faster and more effective action against identity theft and the resulting false advertising with the creation of an alliance between the OFC and the Financial Markets Authority (AMF) to allow for more effective and concerted intervention against image or identity theft. When financial products are involved, the OPC will coordinate with the AMF. The chairman of the OPC and the chairman and CEO of the AMF will also have a new power to issue orders: they will be able, just as a court would, to order a person or company to cease using the image or identity of a person without their consent, for example in fraudulent advertising, and to have the image destroyed. According to the press release announcing the newly adopted legislation, the act aims to eliminate lengthy and costly judicial proceedings for victims while preventing future consumers from falling victim to fraudulent schemes. The legislation also aims to respond to evolving fraud tactics enabled by social media proliferation and technological advancement. Bill 24 enters into force on June 12, 2026.
3240529 pc Jun 12, 2026 pdonofrio Philippines Republic of the Philippines horizon scanning
headline rewritten 99% of draft length open

Generated

1233 chars

Philippines Declares July 1, 2026 Special Non-Working Day in Kibawe Municipality

On June 12, 2026, the Office of the President of the Philippines issued Proclamation No. 1316 s. 2026, declaring Wednesday, July 1, 2026, a special non-working day in the municipality of Kibawe, Province of Bukidnon. The proclamation establishes July 1, 2026, as a special holiday for the municipality, suspending regular business and government operations on that date. This type of proclamation is issued under the authority of Commonwealth Act No. 638, which governs the declaration of special non-working days in the Philippines. Special non-working day declarations are typically made to commemorate significant local events, anniversaries, or occasions of regional importance to specific municipalities or provinces. The proclamation took effect upon its publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines on June 12, 2026. All government offices, educational institutions, and private establishments in Kibawe municipality are expected to observe the special non-working day on July 1, 2026, unless otherwise specified by relevant authorities or employers. REFERENCES: Proclamation No. 1316 s. 2026, Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines, available at: https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1220 chars · nid 93233

US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Issues Information Sharing Guidance to Help Financial Institutions Mitigate Fraud

On June 12, 2026, the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) updated guidance on voluntary information sharing practices that can be used by financial institutions to combat fraud under Section 314(b) of the USA PATRIOT Act . The guidance clarifies that the statutory safe harbor from liability extends to sharing information about suspected fraud and other criminal activities, with financial institutions reminded of their ability to share this intelligence even if suspected activities do not constitute a formal transaction, as defined under federal law. The guidance also clarifies that the types of information permitted for sharing are broad, consisting of transaction information, video surveillance footage and cyber-related data. FinCEN additionally notes that existing Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) regulations already broadly prohibit financial institutions from sharing actual suspicious activity reports (SARs) or revealing their existence. Furthermore, FinCEN advises that, while financial institutions may voluntarily participate in information sharing, these efforts should not result in a failure to maintain adequate procedures to protect the security and confidentiality of shared information.
3237602 gc Jun 12, 2026 apintea European Union Overview on Binding Corporate rules - European Commission gamblingcompliance
headline rewritten 53% of draft length open

Generated

1567 chars

Spain's Aragon Autonomous Community Approves General Gaming Regulation

On June 12, 2026, Spain's Aragon Autonomous Community submitted a notification to the European Commission regarding approval of its General Gaming Regulation (Decreto por el que se aprueba el Reglamento General del Juego de la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón). The notification was registered under reference 2026/0291/ES. The regulation establishes the general framework governing gaming activities within Aragon. This development is significant as it represents a regional regulatory update affecting gaming operators and participants in the autonomous community. The regulation applies to all gaming activities conducted within Aragon's jurisdiction, including land-based and potentially online gaming operations. The standstill period for this notification ends on September 15, 2026. During this period, the European Commission reviews the draft regulation to ensure compliance with European Union law and applicable directives, particularly regarding the free movement of services and non-discrimination principles. Member states and interested parties may raise objections or request clarification during this standstill period. The draft text of the regulation is available in Spanish through the European Commission's TRIS (Technical Regulations Information System) notification database. Stakeholders requiring further information on the regulation's specific provisions should consult the official documentation or contact the Aragon Autonomous Community's gaming regulatory authority. REFERENCES: European Commission TRIS Notification System: 2026/0291/ES

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

830 chars · nid 51501

Spain notifies European Commission of gambling regulation in Aragon

On June 12, 2026, Spain's Aragon Autonomous Community submitted a notification to the European Commission regarding approval of its General Gambling Regulation. The regulation establishes the general framework governing gambling activities within Aragon, integrating and systematizing into one single regulation, rules applicable to various forms of gambling and betting carried out in the autonomous community. The standstill period for this notification ends on September 15, 2026. During this period, the European Commission reviews the draft regulation to ensure compliance with European Union law and applicable directives, particularly regarding the free movement of goods and non-discrimination principles. Member states and interested parties may raise objections or request clarification during this standstill period.
3239068 gc Jun 12, 2026 prandeo Armenia Draft Laws gamblingcompliance
headline rewritten 85% of draft length open

Generated

1695 chars

Armenia Establishes Monthly Reporting Requirements for Gaming and Betting Operators

Armenia's government has drafted new regulations establishing unified procedures, timelines, content requirements, and formats for monthly reporting by gaming, internet gaming, and bookmaking operators to the regulatory authority. The draft regulations aim to implement the Law on Regulation of Gaming Activities and modernise oversight mechanisms in the gaming sector. The proposed regulations repeal two previous government decisions: Decision No. 1355-N from September 8, 2011, and Decision No. 451-N from April 30, 2015. The new framework consolidates and updates reporting requirements to ensure legal certainty, consistency across regulatory instruments, and alignment with current legislative requirements governing the gaming industry. By establishing standardised reporting procedures, the regulations seek to strengthen regulatory oversight and ensure operators comply with statutory obligations through systematic monthly submissions to the competent authority. The draft regulations apply to all licensed gaming operators, internet gaming operators, and bookmaking operators conducting business in Armenia. These entities will be required to submit standardised monthly reports detailing their operations in accordance with the new procedures and formats established by the regulations. The public consultation period runs from June 12, 2026, to June 29, 2026. Stakeholders, including gaming operators, industry representatives, and interested parties, can submit comments and suggestions through the e-draft.am portal during this window. The State Revenue Committee is responsible for reviewing feedback received during the consultation process before finalising the regulations.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1449 chars · nid 51499

Armenian government proposes new reporting framework for gambling operators

On June 12, 2026, the Armenian government published a draft resolution proposing a new framework governing the submission of monthly reports by gambling operators, online gambling operators and bookmakers to the supervisory authority. According to the explanatory memorandum, the existing reporting framework no longer reflects current legislative requirements or modern supervisory practices. The draft regulation would establish updated procedures, deadlines, content requirements and reporting templates for land-based gambling operators, online gambling operators and bookmakers. Separate reporting procedures and standardised reporting forms are proposed for each sector, with the aim of creating a unified and modernised reporting framework. The State Revenue Committee stated that the reforms are intended to strengthen regulatory oversight by ensuring that operators submit comparable information in a standardised format. The proposal also seeks to improve transparency and accountability within the sector and support the implementation of risk-based supervision. According to the explanatory memorandum, the new framework would provide supervisory authorities with a more comprehensive information base for monitoring gambling activities and developing state policy in the sector. The authorities expect the reforms to improve the effectiveness of regulatory control and facilitate the practical implementation of supervisory measures.
3233420 pc Jun 12, 2026 pthandapani Thailand Announcements and Circulars - FIPCS horizon scanning
headline rewritten 131% of draft length open

Generated

2008 chars

Thailand's Bank of Thailand Publishes Payment Service Risk Management Guidelines for Electronic Payment Operators

On June 11, 2569 (2026), the Bank of Thailand (BOT) issued Announcement No. 25/2569 concerning guidelines for managing risks arising from customer use of payment services for payment service operators regulated under Thailand's Payment System Act. The announcement was published in the Royal Gazette on June 10, 2569, and became effective June 11, 2569. The guidelines apply to three categories of regulated payment service operators: electronic money service providers, electronic bill payment service providers, and electronic fund transfer service providers. The BOT established these guidelines to elevate risk management practices, prevent misuse of payment services, and protect payment service users. The announcement aims to prevent payment services from being used for money laundering, terrorism financing, or other illegal activities. The guidelines establish comprehensive risk management requirements covering the entire customer lifecycle, from customer identification through transaction monitoring and relationship termination. Key requirements include: implementing Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures; conducting enhanced customer due diligence (EDD) for high-risk customers; establishing transaction monitoring systems to detect unusual financial activity; maintaining robust governance structures with clear roles for boards, senior management, and internal control functions; and implementing a three-lines-of-defense model. Payment service operators must also maintain customer records and documentation for regulatory inspection, establish procedures for assisting affected customers, and report suspicious transactions to the BOT according to specified formats. Payment service operators must implement these guidelines immediately and ensure all staff understand their responsibilities. The BOT's Payment System Policy and Financial Technology Division oversees implementation and can be contacted at 0 2283 5054, 0 2356 7230, 0 2283 6931, or PSD-policyreg@bot.or.th for guidance.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

2626 chars · nid 93196

Bank of Thailand Publishes Payment Service Risk Management Guidelines for Electronic Payment Operators

The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has issued payment service risk management guidelines for electronic payment operators The guidance prescribes: Board and senior management oversight mandating that the board of directors approve and regularly review written risk management policies regarding customer payment service usage. Senior management must strictly implement these policies, establish clear reporting structures, and ensure an effective three lines of defense model across the organization. Three lines of defense requiring business units (first line) to collect customer data and monitor for unusual behavior, while the compliance or risk management function (second line) oversees adherence to policies, and the internal audit function (third line) independently reviews the effectiveness of these controls. KYC and Customer Due Diligence (CDD) instructing operators to implement Know Your Customer (KYC) processes commensurate with product risk and conduct CDD to identify ultimate beneficial owners, screen against designated persons lists, and verify the purpose of the business relationship. Operators must apply Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) and potentially refuse to establish relationships or process transactions if customers present high risks or if information cannot be verified. Identity verification and authentication stipulating that operators must enforce appropriate identity verification measures before allowing payment service usage, such as utilizing multi-factor authentication for non-face-to-face channels, to mitigate the risk of identity theft and unauthorized access. Transaction monitoring and handling obligating operators to maintain effective systems to monitor, detect, and investigate unusual transaction patterns based on internal rules, industry standards, and regulatory alerts. If a transaction strongly indicates criminal involvement, the operator must conduct EDD, suspend the specific service or transaction, and investigate associated accounts linked to the operator. Record-keeping and reporting directing operators to securely retain customer documents, behavioral records, and transaction details from the start of the business relationship until its termination, plus the legally required retention period. Operators must also submit reports on unusual transaction activities to the BOT to facilitate sector-wide risk evaluation. Customer remediation requiring operators to establish appropriate, rapid, and fair procedures to remediate and care for customers who are negatively impacted by risk management actions if their transactions are later proven to be legitimate
3230590 pc Jun 12, 2026 pthandapani Singapore Monetary Authority of Singapore financial services
headline rewritten 79% of draft length open

Generated

2001 chars

Singapore's Monetary Authority Publishes Good Disclosure Practices for Retail Environmental Social Governance Funds

On June 10, 2026, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published an information paper setting out good disclosure practices for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) funds in their adherence with Circular No. CFC 02/2022: Disclosure and Reporting Guidelines for Retail ESG Funds. The information paper outlines MAS's supervisory expectations for effective governance structures, frameworks, policies, and procedures, and controls with respect to valuation of funds' assets. These expectations are based on key findings from thematic inspections of selected fund management companies' (FMCs) investment processes across a range of investment strategies, including those conducted by external auditors appointed by MAS. The paper also sets out MAS's supervisory expectations for effective governance structures, frameworks, policies, and procedures for overseeing and managing FMCs' investment processes. Additionally, the information paper outlines MAS's supervisory expectations and good practices observed in prospecting and advertising activities; advisory and sales processes; safeguards for sales to vulnerable customers; and complaints handling processes. Fund managers offering retail ESG funds should review the guidance to ensure their disclosure practices align with MAS's supervisory expectations. The information paper is intended to assist FMCs in strengthening their governance frameworks and investment oversight processes. Fund managers are encouraged to adopt the good practices outlined in the information paper to enhance transparency and investor protection in the retail ESG funds market. The guidance complements existing regulatory requirements under Circular No. CFC 02/2022 and supports MAS's broader objective of promoting fair dealing and effective governance in Singapore's collective investment schemes market. REFERENCES: Monetary Authority of Singapore. (2026, June 10). Good Disclosure Practices for Retail ESG Funds. Retrieved from https://www.mas.gov.sg/

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1575 chars · nid 93195

Monetary Authority of Singapore Publishes Good Disclosure Practices for Retail Environmental Social Governance Funds

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has issued an information paper on good disclosure practices for retail ESG funds. This information paper prescribes: Investment Focus and Strategy : It is good practice for managers to clearly define ESG-related terms and avoiding vague terminology such as "sustainable leaders" without explanation. When using ESG criteria or metrics, managers should disclose the sources (proprietary or third-party), calculation methodologies, underlying data descriptions, and minimum ESG ratings or scores that investments must meet. Where investments do not meet minimum ESG scores, managers should disclose alternative criteria or due diligence processes. Reference Benchmark : For ESG funds tracking an ESG index, managers should disclose the nature of the ESG data, potential frequency of changes to index methodologies, and the benchmark's methodology. Managers should also disclose if they or related corporations influence the construction of the index. Risks : The prospectus of an ESG fund should outline risks related to its ESG focus and investment strategy. For recognized ESG funds, it is recommended to include a summary of these risks in the Singapore wrapper for clarity. Additional Information : If an ESG fund uses stakeholder engagement activities to achieve its ESG goals, it should disclose the purpose, extent, and mechanisms of such engagement, including conditions for divestment. Managers are also encouraged to provide periodic updates on engagement activities, including actual voting records, on their websites.
3235271 pc Jun 12, 2026 csoo United Kingdom Bank of England horizon scanning
headline rewritten 31% of draft length open

Generated

2416 chars

Bank of England Publishes Updated Governance Code for Recognised Payment System Operators

On June 12, 2026, the Bank of England published an updated policy statement and supervisory statement on governance requirements for recognised payment system operators (RPSOs). The governance code, which was initially published in June 2017 and has since been updated, establishes binding minimum requirements for payment systems recognised under section 184 of the Banking Act 2009 (the Act). The code does not apply to payment systems operated by recognised clearing houses (RCHs) or central securities depositories (CSDs), which are subject to separate regulatory requirements. The code, issued under section 189 of the Act, establishes that RPSOs must function as systemic risk managers with objectives supporting financial stability. RPSOs must assess and mitigate the impact of their actions on UK financial stability, manage financial and operational risks across the payment system, and maintain robust business continuity plans. The Bank may take enforcement action against RPSOs that fail to comply with code requirements under sections 196-202A of the Act. The supervisory statement provides detailed guidance on compliance expectations. Key governance requirements include board composition standards requiring a minimum of one-third independent non-executive directors (INEDs), at least one executive director, and at least two INEDs. The board chair must be an INED. Board committees addressing governance or risk assessment must be chaired by INEDs. RPSOs must establish procedures for identifying and managing conflicts of interest and implement performance management arrangements, including accountability mechanisms for the board chair overseen by a senior INED. The code applies to all RPSOs except those operated by RCHs or CSDs. For overseas-based RPSOs subject to equivalent domestic supervision implementing the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI) with effective international cooperation arrangements, the Bank may determine on a case-by-case basis that the code does not apply. The Bank currently does not apply code requirements to CLS Bank International under this exemption. RPSOs must comply with the code requirements by June 21, 2018. Newly recognised payment systems have twelve months from recognition to achieve full compliance. The Bank expects RPSOs to conduct self-assessments and develop transition plans to meet requirements by the implementation date.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

741 chars · nid 93194

UK's Prudential Regulation Authority Publishes Policy Statement on Governance of Recognised Payment System Operators

On June 12, 2026, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published its policy statement regarding the governance of Recognised Payment System Operators (RPSOs) in the UK. The policy statement confirms that the PRA has decided to develop a code for payment system operators that have been recognised by HM Treasury under the Banking Act 2009 . The code will provide transparency on the minimum requirements that all RPSOs to which the code applies must meet. The code covers the following areas: Systemic risk manager Governance arrangements Composition of the board The Executive Conflict of interest Performance management Records This policy statement is accompanied by an updated supervisory statement to complement the code.
3233666 pc Jun 12, 2026 kgurnani Australia Australian Securities and Investments Comission horizon scanning
headline rewritten 102% of draft length open

Generated

2261 chars

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Secures Record $300 Million Penalties Against CFD Operators

On March 26, 2026, the Federal Court ordered record penalties totalling $300.2 million against Union Standard International Group Pty Ltd (Union Standard) and its former authorised representatives for systemic unconscionable conduct and contraventions of Australian financial services law between 2018 and 2020. Justice Wigney imposed $156.7 million in penalties against Union Standard, $114.1 million against Maxi EFX Global AU Pty Ltd (trading as EuropeFX), and $29.4 million against BrightAU Capital Pty Ltd (trading as TradeFred). Customers of EuropeFX and TradeFred lost more than $83 million. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found that Union Standard, EuropeFX and TradeFred operated business models deliberately targeting inexperienced and vulnerable people using aggressive sales tactics to pressure them to trade in highly risky contracts for difference (CFD) products. Account managers reassured customers that CFDs suited their financial situation, when in reality most customers lost money, with EuropeFX and TradeFred profiting from customer losses in up to 95 to 99 percent of cases. The entities derived bulk revenue from customer trading losses, provided remuneration incentives to pressure customers to deposit more funds, made misleading representations about profits, and failed to provide adequate explanations about complex financial products and associated risks. Union Standard was held liable for the conduct of its authorised representatives, underscoring that Australian financial services (AFS) licensees remain fully accountable for misconduct carried out under their licence. The Court also ordered an adverse publicity order against EuropeFX, a permanent restraint on EuropeFX from carrying on financial services business, and that EuropeFX refund customers' net deposits. This marks the first time a civil penalty has been imposed against an entity for failing to ensure financial services were provided efficiently, honestly and fairly by actively marketing CFDs to customers in China. The orders have been temporarily stayed until July 13, 2026. ASIC's product intervention order on CFDs will expire on May 23, 2027, unless remade, with ASIC consulting industry in 2026 on the proposed way forward.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

2296 chars · nid 93180

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Secures Record A$300 Million Penalties Against Contracts for Difference Operators

On June 12, 2026, the Federal Court ordered record penalties totalling A$300.2 million against Union Standard International Group Pty Ltd (Union Standard) and its former authorised representatives for systemic unconscionable conduct and contraventions of their obligations as a Australian Financial Services licensee between 2018 and 2020. Justice Wigney imposed A$156.7 million in penalties against Union Standard, A$114.1 million against Maxi EFX Global AU Pty Ltd (trading as EuropeFX), and A$29.4 million against BrightAU Capital Pty Ltd (trading as TradeFred). Customers of EuropeFX and TradeFred lost more than A$83 million. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found that Union Standard, EuropeFX and TradeFred operated business models deliberately targeting inexperienced and vulnerable people using aggressive sales tactics to pressure them to trade in highly risky contracts for difference (CFD) products. Account managers reassured customers that CFDs suited their financial situation, when in reality most customers lost money, with EuropeFX and TradeFred profiting from customer losses in up to 95 to 99 percent of cases. The entities derived bulk revenue from customer trading losses, provided remuneration incentives to pressure customers to deposit more funds, made misleading representations about profits, and failed to provide adequate explanations about complex financial products and associated risks. Union Standard was held liable for the conduct of its authorised representatives, underscoring that Australian financial services (AFS) licensees remain fully accountable for misconduct carried out under their licence. The Court also ordered an adverse publicity order against EuropeFX, a permanent restraint on EuropeFX from carrying on financial services business, and that EuropeFX refund customers' net deposits. This marks the first time a civil penalty has been imposed against an entity for failing to ensure financial services were provided efficiently, honestly and fairly by actively marketing CFDs to customers in China. The orders have been temporarily stayed until July 13, 2026. ASIC's product intervention order on CFDs will expire on May 23, 2027, unless remade, with ASIC consulting industry in 2026 on the proposed way forward.
3231501 pc Jun 12, 2026 tojuri Hungary Government of Hungary horizon scanning
headline kept 45% of draft length open

Generated

1070 chars

Hungary's Government Launches Public Consultation on Crypto-Asset Exchange Rules

On June 11, 2026, the Government of Hungary's Ministry of Finance launched a public consultation on proposed legislation to repeal certain legal provisions concerning crypto-asset exchange services. The consultation concerns a bill that would repeal specific statutory provisions affecting crypto-asset exchange service providers. The Ministry of Finance has published supporting documentation including a content summary, the proposed legislative text (norma), justification (indoklás), and an impact assessment sheet (hatásvizsgálati lap) to inform stakeholders of the proposed changes. The consultation period ends on June 19, 2026. Stakeholders and interested parties may submit comments and feedback on the proposed legislative changes via email during this timeframe. The documentation is available for download from the Government of Hungary's documentation portal. REFERENCES: Government of Hungary. "Társadalmi egyeztetés a kriptoeszköz-átváltás szabályairól" [Public Consultation on Crypto-Asset Exchange Rules]. Accessed June 11, 2026. https://kormany.hu/

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

486 chars · nid 93176

Hungary's Government Launches Public Consultation on Crypto-Asset Exchange Rules

On June 11, 2026, Hungary's Ministry of Finance launched a public consultation on proposed legislation to repeal certain legal provisions concerning crypto-asset exchange services. The consultation concerns a bill that would repeal specific statutory provisions affecting crypto-asset exchange service providers. Stakeholders and interested parties may submit comments and feedback on the proposed legislative changes by June 19, 2026, via email to kozigazgatasiegyeztetes@ngm.gov.hu .
3232857 pc Jun 12, 2026 tojuri Netherlands De Nederlandsche Bank horizon scanning
headline rewritten 37% of draft length open

Generated

1870 chars

Netherlands Central Bank Imposes Penalty Order on Yoursafe B.V. for Missing Financial Reporting Deadline

On February 5, 2026, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) imposed an order subject to penalty on Yoursafe B.V. (Yoursafe) for failing to submit its independent auditor's report on the 2024 financial statements and annual accounts by the required deadline of December 31, 2025. The enforcement measure was published on June 11, 2026. Yoursafe's failure to submit the required documentation constituted non-compliance with the Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht – Wft). As a remedial measure, DNB issued an order subject to penalty requiring Yoursafe to submit the independent auditor's report within ten working days of the order's issuance. Since Yoursafe failed to comply with this requirement, it must pay a penalty of €12,500. The order subject to penalty is a standard enforcement tool used by DNB to compel regulated entities to meet their supervisory obligations, particularly regarding financial reporting and transparency requirements applicable to electronic money institutions and other supervised entities. Any interested party may lodge an objection against DNB's decision within six weeks of its date. Following an objection, a decision on the objection can be appealed in court within six weeks. Further appeal against the court ruling may be lodged with the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven – CBb). If no objection, appeal, or further appeal is lodged, the decision becomes irrevocable. Yoursafe lodged an objection on February 18, 2026, which it subsequently withdrew on April 22, 2026. REFERENCES: De Nederlandsche Bank. Order subject to penalty imposed on Yoursafe B.V. for failing to submit the independent auditor's report on the 2024 financial statements or the annual accounts for 2024 by the deadline. Available at: https://www.dnb.nl/en/we-regulate/enforcement/enforcement-measures/

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

696 chars · nid 93175

Dutch Central Bank Imposes Penalty Order on Yoursafe B.V. for Missing Financial Reporting Deadline

In a decision dated February 5, 2026, the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) imposed an order subject to penalty on Yoursafe B.V., an e-money institution (EMI), for failing to submit its independent auditor's report on the 2024 financial statements and annual accounts by the required deadline of December 31, 2025. Yoursafe's failure to submit the required documentation constituted non-compliance with the Financial Supervision Act . As a remedial measure, the DNB issued an order subject to penalty requiring Yoursafe to submit the independent auditor's report within ten working days of the order's issuance. Due to the EMI's failure to comply with this requirement, it must pay a penalty of €12,500.
3253321 pc Jun 12, 2026 arahman Ukraine Regulatory Documents financial services
headline rewritten 52% of draft length open

Generated

1815 chars

Ukraine's National Bank Approves Critical Financial Sector Information Infrastructure Regulation

On June 12, 2026, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) Board adopted Resolution No. 66, which approves regulations on critical information infrastructure within the financial sector and amends certain NBU normative acts concerning cybersecurity. The resolution establishes a unified approach to organising the functioning of critical information infrastructure in Ukraine's financial sector. The regulation aims to standardise cybersecurity requirements and operational procedures across financial institutions that manage or depend on critical information systems. By implementing consistent standards, the NBU seeks to enhance the resilience and security of the financial system against cyber threats and operational disruptions. The regulation applies to financial institutions and entities operating critical information infrastructure components within the Ukrainian financial sector. This includes banks, payment service providers, and other financial market participants whose systems are classified as critical to financial stability and continuity of operations. The regulation addresses governance frameworks, security protocols, incident reporting requirements, and recovery procedures for critical information infrastructure. It establishes obligations for financial institutions to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to protect critical systems, monitor for threats, and respond to incidents in a coordinated manner with the NBU. The regulation becomes effective on June 19, 2026. Financial institutions must ensure compliance with the new requirements by this date. The NBU will oversee implementation and may conduct assessments to verify that institutions have adopted the necessary measures to protect critical information infrastructure in accordance with the regulation.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

940 chars · nid 93352

National Bank of Ukraine Adopts Resolution on Cybersecurity and Critical Information Infrastructure

On June 12, 2026, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) adopted Resolution No. 66, which approves regulations on critical information infrastructure (CII) within the financial sector and amends certain NBU normative acts concerning cybersecurity. An operator is required to classify as part of the CII of which it is the owner or manager, and which simultaneously meets the following criteria: A disruption in the normal operation of such information and communication systems would directly lead to a crisis situation at the operator's critical infrastructure facility. The operator does not have alternative information and communication systems with equivalent functional capabilities to ensure the normal operation of the operator's critical infrastructure facility. Reports on incidents shall be submitted via email to atcyber@bank.gov.ua . This resolution comes into effect on the day following the date of its official publication.
3231888 pc Jun 12, 2026 tojuri Netherlands Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets horizon scanning
headline rewritten 115% of draft length open

Generated

1927 chars

Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets Calls for Strengthened Information and Communications Technology Risk Management Under Digital Operational Resilience Act

On June 11, 2026, the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) published findings from a thematic review of trading platforms' information and communications technology (ICT) risk management frameworks under the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), which became fully applicable across Europe on January 1, 2025. The AFM's review examined how regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities, and organised trading facilities have implemented DORA requirements. The authority identified four key areas requiring improvement. First, gap analyses conducted by trading platforms remain insufficiently detailed, with many assessments too broad to identify relevant DORA requirements or emerging deficiencies. Second, certain ICT risk management framework components require enhanced coverage, particularly security monitoring, access controls, logging, emergency changes, and continuity management—measures the AFM considers crucial for cyber resilience and orderly market functioning. Third, policies and procedures lack consistent qualification and clear distinction, creating uncertainty about whether specific requirements are properly documented as regulations demand. Fourth, when trading platforms use ICT services within their corporate groups, DORA-compliant policies and procedures are not always adopted at group level, limiting consistency and ICT risk control. The AFM emphasised that while trading platforms generally possess foundational DORA implementations, further steps are necessary to achieve full and sustainable compliance. The authority will continue supervising digital operational resilience compliance, increasingly focusing on practical application rather than documentation alone. The AFM will intervene where institutions fail to meet statutory requirements. Trading platforms should consider the review's findings and recommendations when advancing their DORA implementation efforts.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

2210 chars · nid 93173

Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets Publishes Finding of Thematic Review on ICT Risk Management Under DORA

On June 11, 2026, the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) published findings from a thematic review of trading platforms' ICT risk management frameworks under the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). The AFM's review examined how regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities and organised trading facilities have implemented DORA requirements. The authority identified four key areas requiring improvement and set out its recommendations for improvement, which are to: Ensure a sufficiently detailed DORA gap assessment - the AMF found that gap assessments conducted by trading platforms remain insufficiently detailed, with many being too broad to identify relevant DORA requirements or emerging deficiencies. Improve the design and coverage of core ICT risk management framework controls - the AFM found that certain ICT risk management framework components require enhanced coverage, particularly security monitoring, access controls, logging, emergency changes and continuity management. These are measures the AFM considers crucial for cyber resilience and orderly market functioning. Ensure that policies are correctly scoped and formally approved in line with Article 2 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774 - the AMF found that policies and procedures lack consistent qualification and clear distinction, creating uncertainty about whether specific requirements are properly documented as regulations demand. Apply group-level DORA-compliant policies for intragroup ICT services - the AMF found that when trading platforms use ICT services within their corporate groups, DORA-compliant policies and procedures are not always adopted at the group level, limiting consistency and ICT risk control. The AFM emphasised that although trading platforms generally possess foundational DORA implementations, further steps are necessary to achieve full and sustainable compliance. The authority will continue supervising digital operational resilience compliance, increasingly focusing on practical application rather than documentation alone. Trading platforms should consider the review's findings and recommendations when advancing their DORA implementation efforts.
3242435 pc Jun 12, 2026 arahman Ukraine Regulatory Documents financial services
headline rewritten 54% of draft length open

Generated

1423 chars

Ukraine's National Bank Issues Amendments to Regulatory Acts

On June 12, 2026, the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) adopted Resolution No. 61 amending various regulatory acts issued by the NBU. The resolution represents a routine regulatory update to the NBU's normative framework governing financial services operations in Ukraine. The resolution amends multiple existing NBU regulatory documents, though the specific amendments and their substantive content are not detailed in the available source material. Such resolutions typically address technical updates, procedural clarifications, or adjustments to existing regulatory requirements affecting financial institutions operating under NBU supervision. The amendments may cover areas including licensing requirements, prudential standards, reporting obligations, or operational procedures for banks and other financial service providers. The resolution was formally adopted by the NBU Board on June 12, 2026, and is available in both portable document format (PDF) and Microsoft Word format (DOCX) for download from the NBU's official website. Financial institutions and other regulated entities subject to NBU oversight should review the full text of Resolution No. 61 to identify any amendments affecting their compliance obligations or operational requirements. The effective date of the amendments and any transition periods for implementation should be confirmed by consulting the complete resolution document.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

772 chars · nid 93249

National Bank of Ukraine Amends Regulatory Acts Regarding Financial Inclusion Banks

On June 12, 2026, the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) adopted Resolution No. 61 amending various regulatory acts issued by the NBU. The NBU may decide to conduct an unscheduled inspection of a financial inclusion bank if, during off-site supervision, facts are identified that may indicate: The financial inclusion bank's failure to comply with the requirements, restrictions and prohibitions established by Ukrainian legislation. The bank's failure to ensure the implementation of its financial inclusion strategy and business plan. The resolution also approved the Amendments to the Regulation on the Application of Enforcement Measures by the National Bank of Ukraine, approved by Resolution No. 346. This resolution comes into effect on June 26, 2026.
3242434 pc Jun 12, 2026 arahman Ukraine Regulatory Documents financial services
headline rewritten 44% of draft length open

Generated

1448 chars

Ukraine's National Bank Amends Regulatory Acts Governing Financial Institution Operations

On June 12, 2026, the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) adopted Resolution No. 64, which amends certain regulatory and legal acts of the NBU. The resolution takes effect on June 26, 2026. The amendment forms part of broader regulatory developments at the NBU, including ongoing consultation on a draft regulation governing the activities of financial inclusion banks. This consultation commenced on May 21, 2026, and represents the NBU's continued effort to refine its regulatory framework for financial institutions operating within Ukraine's financial services sector. The specific amendments introduced by Resolution No. 64 are not detailed in the available source material. However, the resolution's adoption indicates the NBU's active engagement in updating its normative framework to address evolving requirements within Ukraine's banking and financial services landscape. Financial institutions and market participants subject to NBU regulation should review the full text of Resolution No. 64 to understand how the amendments affect their compliance obligations and operational requirements. The resolution is available in PDF and DOCX formats from the NBU's official documentation portal. REFERENCES: National Bank of Ukraine. Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine No. 64 of June 12, 2026, "On Amendments to Certain Normative Legal Acts of the National Bank of Ukraine." Available at: [NBU Official Portal]

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

643 chars · nid 93248

National Bank of Ukraine Amends Regulatory Acts Governing Financial Inclusion

On June 12, 2026, the Board of the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) adopted Resolution No. 64, which amends certain regulatory and legal acts of the NBU. Key amendments include: A financial inclusion bank shall establish a risk management system that takes into account the requirements, restrictions, and prohibitions established for financial inclusion banks by Ukrainian legislation. A financial inclusion bank shall establish an internal control system that takes into account the requirements, restrictions and prohibitions established for financial inclusion bank by Ukrainian legislation. The resolution takes effect on June 26, 2026.
3237468 pc Jun 12, 2026 arahman Sweden News - Government horizon scanning
headline rewritten 48% of draft length open

Generated

1699 chars

Sweden's Government Designates Five Authorities as National Competent Authorities Under AI Regulation

On June 12, 2026, the Swedish Government designated five national authorities as competent authorities under the AI Regulation (AI-förordningen). The Swedish Post and Telecom Authority (Post- och telestyrelsen, PTS), the Data Protection Authority (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten), the Financial Supervisory Authority (Finansinspektionen), the Medical Products Agency (Läkemedelsverket), and the Board for Accreditation and Technical Control (Swedac) received the mandate through a government assignment issued by the Ministry of Finance (Finansdepartementet). The designation establishes these five authorities as the national competent authorities responsible for implementing and enforcing the AI Regulation across their respective sectors. Each authority will oversee compliance with AI-related requirements within its regulatory domain. PTS will handle telecommunications and digital services; the Data Protection Authority will address privacy and data protection aspects; the Financial Supervisory Authority will manage AI applications in financial services; the Medical Products Agency will oversee AI use in pharmaceutical and medical contexts; and Swedac will supervise AI applications in accreditation and technical standardisation areas. This assignment aligns with Sweden's broader artificial intelligence strategy and reflects the government's commitment to establishing a coordinated regulatory framework for AI governance across multiple sectors. The designation enables Sweden to fulfil its obligations under the EU's AI Regulation by ensuring designated authorities have clear responsibility for monitoring, enforcement, and guidance on AI compliance within their respective fields.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

811 chars · nid 93220

Sweden's Government Designates Authorities as National Competent Authorities Under AI Regulation

On June 12, 2026, the Swedish government designated five national authorities as competent authorities under the Artificial Intelligence ( AI) Regulation . The Swedish Post and Telecom Authority (PTS), the Data Protection Authority, the Financial Supervisory Authority, the Medical Products Agency and the Board for Accreditation and Technical Control (Swedac) received the mandate through a government assignment issued by the Ministry of Finance. The PTS shall be the market surveillance authority of: The prohibited areas AI. High-risk AI systems. Transparency requirements under the AI Regulation. The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority shall be the market surveillance authority of: The prohibited areas of AI. High-risk AI systems. This mandate shall remain in effect until December 31, 2026.
3237046 pc Jun 12, 2026 arahman Ukraine News - Central Bank financial services
headline rewritten 73% of draft length open

Generated

2019 chars

Ukraine's National Bank Unifies Reserve Requirements for Interbank Repo Transactions

On June 12, 2026, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) announced amendments to unify how banks calculate reserve requirements for interbank repo transactions. Effective August 10, 2026, funds raised by banks from resident banks through repo transactions will no longer be subject to reserve requirements, regardless of whether transactions are concluded directly between banks or through a central counterparty. The NBU will exclude from the reserve base funds raised through repo transactions concluded with a central counterparty on organized capital markets, provided those funds were raised by the central counterparty from another resident bank. However, funds raised through repo transactions with a central counterparty from non-resident entities will continue to be subject to reserve requirements. Reserve requirements represent funds that banks must set aside in correspondent accounts with the central bank, calculated as a percentage of the bank's liabilities and averaged over the reserve period. This mechanism allows banks to manage liquidity fluctuations while enabling the NBU to absorb excess liquidity from the banking system. The NBU anticipates these changes will increase banks' participation in repo transactions through central counterparties, thereby strengthening the interbank money market and enhancing monetary transmission. The amendments also align Ukrainian regulations more closely with European Union standards. The changes were introduced through NBU Board Resolution No. 62 on Amendments to the Regulation on the Procedure for Creating and Maintaining Required Reserves by Ukrainian Banks and Branches of Foreign Banks in Ukraine, and NBU Board Decision No. 183 on Amendments to NBU Board Decision No. 752. Both instruments were adopted on June 12, 2026, and take effect on August 10, 2026. The proposals were developed following consultation with the Money Market and Forex Contact Group, the National Association of the Banks of Ukraine, the Settlement Center, and Ukrainian banks.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1470 chars · nid 93219

National Bank of Ukraine Unifies Reserve Requirements for Interbank Repo Transactions

On June 12, 2026, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) announced amendments to unify how banks calculate reserve requirements for interbank repo transactions. Funds raised by banks from resident banks through repo transactions will no longer be subject to reserve requirements, regardless of whether transactions are concluded directly between banks or through a central counterparty. The NBU will exclude from the reserve base funds raised through repo transactions concluded with a central counterparty on organised capital markets, provided those funds were raised by the central counterparty from another resident bank. However, funds raised through repo transactions with a central counterparty from non-resident bank will continue to be subject to reserve requirements. Reserve requirements represent funds that banks must set aside in correspondent accounts with the central bank, calculated as a percentage of the bank's liabilities and averaged over the reserve period. This mechanism allows banks to manage liquidity fluctuations while enabling the NBU to absorb excess liquidity from the banking system. The NBU anticipates these changes will increase banks' participation in repo transactions through central counterparties, thereby strengthening the interbank money market and enhancing monetary transmission. The amendments also align Ukrainian regulations more closely with European Union standards. These amendments come into effect on August 10, 2026.
3231893 pc Jun 12, 2026 tojuri Malta Malta Financial Services Authority horizon scanning
headline rewritten 131% of draft length open

Generated

2242 chars

Malta Financial Services Authority Issues Marketing Communications Guidance for Investment Firms

On June 8, 2026, the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) issued a Dear Chief Executive Officer letter to investment firms licensed in Malta, setting out key findings and expectations arising from a thematic review of marketing practices conducted during 2025. The letter addresses compliance outcomes-based supervision, a three-year supervisory engagement cycle focused on achieving measurable results in consumer protection, financial stability, and market integrity. The MFSA's 2025 thematic review examined eight locally licensed investment firms representing 11 percent of all investment firms servicing retail clients. The review assessed five main areas: policies and procedures for producing and approving marketing communications; outsourcing arrangements; disclosure mediums; fair, clear, and not misleading marketing communications; and record-keeping practices. The Authority identified significant deficiencies across multiple firms, including overly brief or inconsistent policies, inadequate post-publication checks on marketing materials, missing regulatory disclosures, and incomplete record-keeping registers. The MFSA also noted concerns regarding the fair presentation of risks versus benefits, missing statements on external hyperlinks, and inappropriate references to regulatory approval or endorsement. Key expectations outlined by the MFSA include: establishing detailed, regularly reviewed policies reflecting actual operational practices; conducting periodic post-publication checks on all marketing materials commensurate with firm size and complexity; ensuring fair and balanced presentation of risks and benefits; implementing robust segmentation processes for targeted communications; providing formal training to third-party service providers; and maintaining comprehensive marketing registers for a minimum of five years. The Authority emphasised that investment firms remain ultimately responsible for marketing compliance, regardless of outsourcing arrangements. The MFSA will conduct follow-up assessments during the second and third years of its supervisory cycle to verify remediation of identified deficiencies and full alignment with regulatory obligations under the Conduct of Business Rulebook.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

2932 chars · nid 93166

Malta Financial Services Authority Issues Dear CEO Letter on Marketing Communications Guidance for Investment Firms

The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) has issued a Dear CEO letter to investment firms licensed in Malta, setting out key findings and expectations arising from a 2025 thematic review of marketing practices. The letter aims to provide further guidance to licensed entities on how to address certain issues in accordance with applicable rules, regulations and guidelines. It presents the key findings from the MFSA’s thematic review, identifies observations, highlights good and bad practices, and outlines the MFSA’s expectations. The MFSA's 2025 thematic review examined eight locally licensed investment firms representing 11 percent of all investment firms servicing retail clients. The review assessed five main areas: Policies and procedures for producing and approving marketing communications. Outsourcing arrangements. Disclosure mediums. Fair, clear and not misleading marketing communications. Record-keeping practices. The MFSA identified significant deficiencies across multiple firms, including overly brief or inconsistent policies, inadequate post-publication checks on marketing materials, missing regulatory disclosures and incomplete record-keeping registers. The MFSA also noted concerns about the fair presentation of risks and benefits, missing statements regarding external hyperlinks and inappropriate references to regulatory approval or endorsement. Key expectations outlined by the MFSA include: Establishing detailed, regularly reviewed policies reflecting actual operational practices. Conducting periodic post-publication checks on all marketing materials commensurate with firm size and complexity. Ensuring fair and balanced presentation of risks and benefits. Implementing robust segmentation processes for targeted communications. Providing formal training to third-party service providers. Maintaining comprehensive marketing registers for a minimum of five years. Among its observations, the MFSA identified good market practices, such as: Reviewing and keeping marketing policies up to date and aligned with any amendments or additions to the applicable rules. Carrying out gap analyses in line with the ESMA Final Report on the 2023 Common Supervisory Action and Mystery Shopping Exercise on Marketing . Setting out a template of regulatory disclosures to be included on advertising material to be utilised by the marketing team when creating marketing material. Implementing a marketing and advertising checklist to be completed for each advertisement or communication issued. The MFSA emphasised its expectation that licensed entities implement appropriate internal procedures to ensure that marketing materials are fair, clear and not misleading to its ultimate target audience. Therefore, there are expected to at all times be aligned with the requirements set out in Chapter 1, Section 2 of the Conduct of Business Rulebook relating to marketing communications.
3232099 pc Jun 12, 2026 adavies Iceland Official Gazette financial services
headline rewritten 40% of draft length open

Generated

2132 chars

Iceland's Central Bank Implements European Union Derivatives Trading Regulations

On May 27, 2026, Iceland's Central Bank (Seðlabanki Íslands) published regulations implementing European Union rules on derivatives trading, central counterparties, and trade repositories. The regulations, which take effect immediately, replace previous regulations numbered 260/2025 on the same subject matter. The new regulations transpose multiple European Commission delegated and implementing regulations into Icelandic law, establishing technical standards for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets. The rules establish requirements for central clearing obligations, trade repository reporting, collateral management, and risk mitigation procedures for non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives. The regulations specify capital requirements for central counterparties, governance standards for market participants, and operational procedures for trade repositories to collect, compare, and provide access to derivatives data. The regulations apply to financial institutions including credit institutions, investment firms, insurance companies, pension funds, and alternative investment fund managers operating in Iceland's derivatives markets. The Central Bank serves as the competent authority for supervision and enforcement. The regulations incorporate technical standards addressing counterparty risk management, margin requirements, initial and variation margin procedures, default fund contributions, liquidity risk monitoring, and payment prioritisation in default scenarios. Additionally, the rules establish procedures for model review, stress testing, and backtesting, along with requirements for position reporting and data integrity verification by trade repositories. The regulations reference Iceland's Law No. 15/2018 on derivatives trading, central counterparties, and trade repositories as the enabling legislation. The Central Bank designated Björk Sigurgísladóttir as deputy central bank governor for financial supervision and Linda Kolbrún Björgvinsdóttir as chief executive to oversee implementation. **Reference:** Official Gazette (Stjórnartíðindi), Regulation No. 666/2026, published June 11, 2026

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

849 chars · nid 93164

Icelandic Government Implements European Union Derivatives Trading Regulations

On May 27, 2026, the Icelandic government published the Rules on derivatives trading, central counterparties and derivatives trade repositories. The Rules further implement Act No. 15/2018 on derivatives trading, central counterparties and derivatives trade repositories by transposing multiple European Commission delegated and implementing regulations into Icelandic law. The transposed regulations include: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 149/2013. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 150/2013 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 151/2013. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 152/2013. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 153/2013. The Rules enter into force immediately. Additionally, the Rules replace previous Rules No. 260/2025 on derivatives trading, central counterparties and derivatives trade repositories .
3232708 pc Jun 12, 2026 adavies European Union European Banking Authority horizon scanning
headline rewritten 59% of draft length open

Generated

2363 chars

European Banking Authority Launches Early Consultation on Simplified 2027 EU-Wide Stress Test with Climate Risk Integration

On June 11, 2026, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published draft methodology, templates, and template guidance for the 2027 EU-wide stress test. The exercise introduces significant simplifications to improve efficiency and risk sensitivity while maintaining robustness and comparability of results. A total of 63 banks from the EU and Norway, including 47 from the euro area, will participate in the 2027 stress test, covering 75 percent of the EU banking sector. The EBA has substantially reduced data requirements by 55 percent compared with the previous EU-wide stress test, primarily by drawing on regular supervisory reporting. This reduction eliminates overlapping datapoints and templates, lowering administrative burden while improving data consistency, comparability, and quality for supervisors. A major innovation is the structured integration of climate risks—both transition and physical risks—into the stress test framework for the first time. At this stage, climate risks will be assessed through a dedicated module and will not affect core stress test results, marking an important step towards embedding climate considerations into prudential supervision. The stress test provides a common analytical framework to assess the resilience of EU banks and the wider banking system under a common adverse macro-financial scenario, testing capital adequacy under stress. Results will feed into the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). The EBA applies a primarily constrained bottom-up approach, complemented by supervisory top-down elements, including projections of net interest income and net fee and commission income. The EBA launched the industry consultation at an earlier stage than previous stress tests to facilitate banks' preparedness. The EBA plans to hold a series of workshops with the industry to respond to questions and support their preparations. The European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) and European Central Bank (ECB) will develop the adverse macroeconomic and climate risk scenario, while the EBA Board of Supervisors will finalise scenarios, methodology, quality assurance practices, templates, and guidance. REFERENCES: European Banking Authority. "The EBA launches early consultation on simplified EU-wide stress test, with climate risk integration." Press Release, June 11, 2026. https://www.eba.europa.eu/

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1396 chars · nid 93163

European Banking Authority Consults on Simplified 2027 EU-Wide Stress Test with Climate Risk Integration

On June 11, 2026, the European Banking Authority (EBA) launched a consultation on its draft methodology, templates, and template guidance for the 2027 EU-wide stress test. The exercise introduces significant simplifications to improve efficiency and risk sensitivity while maintaining robustness and comparability of results. A total of 63 banks from the EU and Norway, including 47 from the euro area, will participate in the 2027 stress test, covering 75 percent of the EU banking sector. The EBA has substantially reduced data requirements by 55 percent compared with the previous EU-wide stress test, primarily by drawing on regular supervisory reporting. This reduction eliminates overlapping datapoints and templates, lowering administrative burden while improving data consistency, comparability, and quality for supervisors. A major innovation is the structured integration of climate risks, both transition and physical risks, into the stress test framework for the first time. At this stage, climate risks will be assessed through a dedicated module and will not affect core stress test results, marking an important step towards embedding climate considerations into prudential supervision. The EBA launched the industry consultation at an earlier stage than previous stress tests to facilitate banks' preparedness. However, the EBA has not yet explained when the consultation ends.
3237188 pc Jun 12, 2026 rghosh Ghana Bank of Ghana – Central Bank - Latest News horizon scanning
headline rewritten 101% of draft length open

Generated

1496 chars

(no TITLE: in output)

I appreciate your detailed instructions, but I must note that the source material provided is a webpage listing Bank of Ghana announcements and notices without substantive content detail. The page displays only metadata (dates, titles, and document names) rather than the actual content of any specific announcement or notice. To generate a compliant Horizon Scanning update, I require the actual body text or substantive content of a specific Bank of Ghana announcement, notice, press release, or policy document. The current source only shows: - Document titles (e.g., "Notice to Banks, Payment Service Providers, Regulated Financial Institutions and The General Public") - Publication dates (ranging from May 1, 2026 to June 12, 2026) - Document categories (notices, press releases, statements) **To proceed, please provide:** 1. The full text of a specific Bank of Ghana announcement or notice you wish converted into a Horizon Scanning update, OR 2. Clarification on which document from the list above should be the basis for the update Once you supply the substantive content, I will generate a compliant update following all specified formatting, style, and structural requirements, including: - A declarative title (10-20 words, jurisdiction + authority + present-tense verb) - Body text (200-250 words) with jurisdiction, authority, description, dates, and applicable links - Active voice and proper terminology per the style guide - Appropriate acronym definitions on first mention

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1512 chars · nid 93213

Bank of Ghana Issues Notice to Banks, Payment Service Providers and Regulated Financial Institutions

On June 12, 2026, the Bank of Ghana published a notice directing regulated financial institutions to cease supporting unauthorised fiat currency wallet services denominated in United States dollars operated by crypto platforms in Ghana. The Bank of Ghana also: Identified that certain crypto platforms are operating fiat currency wallet arrangements denominated in foreign currencies, principally United States Dollars, for users in Ghana, supported through bank transfers, payment cards, and other payment channels provided by regulated financial institutions. The relevant crypto platforms have not been authorised by the Bank of Ghana to undertake such activities. Confirmed that these arrangements involve activities requiring authorisation under the Payment Systems and Services Act, 2019 (Act 987) and the Foreign Exchange Act, 2006 (Act 723) . Directed banks, Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions, Electronic Money Issuers, Payment Service Providers, and all other regulated financial institutions to refrain from establishing or maintaining arrangements that facilitate the funding, operation, settlement, or customer access to unauthorised fiat currency wallet services offered to users in Ghana. Directed institutions that currently provide banking, payment, card acquiring, settlement, or related services in support of such arrangements to take immediate steps to discontinue that support. Confirmed that failure to comply with this Directive may result in supervisory or enforcement action.
3237187 pc Jun 12, 2026 rghosh Ghana Bank of Ghana – Central Bank - Latest News horizon scanning
headline rewritten 55% of draft length open

Generated

1364 chars

(no TITLE: in output)

I appreciate you providing the detailed instructions and style guide. However, I must note that the webpage content you've provided consists primarily of a navigation menu and cookie policy from the Bank of Ghana website, rather than substantive regulatory or policy content. The only concrete information available is: - A notice dated June 12, 2026, addressed to International Money Operators (IMTOs), Banks, Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions (SDIs), and Payment Service Providers (PSPs) - A reference to a notice dated June 2, 2026, regarding Banks, Payment Service Providers, Regulated Financial Institutions and the General Public The actual content of these notices is not included in the source material provided—only their titles and publication dates appear in the news listing. **To generate a compliant Horizon Scanning update, I would need:** 1. The full text of the June 12, 2026 notice to IMTOs, Banks, SDIs, and PSPs 2. Details of what regulatory action, guidance, or requirement the notice contains 3. Any effective dates, compliance deadlines, or substantive policy changes outlined in the notice Could you please provide the complete notice document or the full content of the announcement? Once I have the substantive material, I will generate a comprehensive Horizon Scanning update following all the specifications you've outlined.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

756 chars · nid 93211

Bank of Ghana Issues Notice for International Money Operators (IMTOs), Banks and PSPs

On June 12, 2026, the Bank of Ghana published a notice extending the registration deadline for International Money Transfer Operators (IMTO) operating in Ghana to July 31, 2026. The Bank also directed all existing IMTOs to regularise their operations and submit all required documentation to the Bank on or before July 31, 2026, and confirmed that existing IMTOs that fail to comply with registration requirements within the stipulated timeframe will not be permitted to operate in Ghana. Any existing arrangements or partnerships with banks, Specialised Deposit-Taking Institutions, and Payment Service Providers will be rendered null and void, and non-compliant entities may be subject to further regulatory and enforcement action under applicable laws.
3238641 gc Jun 12, 2026 apintea France ANJ (regulator) (check manually) gamblingcompliance
headline rewritten 100% of draft length open

Generated

2244 chars

France's National Gaming Authority Adopts Comprehensive Fraud Prevention Guide for Online Gambling Operators

On June 9, 2026, the Autorité nationale des jeux (ANJ), France's gaming regulator, adopted a comprehensive guide addressing fraud prevention by online gambling operators. The decision, published on June 12, 2026, establishes detailed procedures and recommendations for identifying, characterizing, and managing fraudulent player activity across online gaming platforms. The guide applies to all online gaming offerings requiring player registration, including competitive gaming, online lotteries, and physical distribution networks with online account requirements. It excludes cases involving money laundering or terrorism financing suspicions, which remain subject to separate financial crime regulations. The ANJ identifies five primary fraud categories: civil identity fraud (including document falsification, identity alteration, identity usurpation, account sharing, and multiple accounts); payment method fraud (including falsified banking documents and unauthorized card use); abusive chargeback disputes; gaming fraud (including poker collusion, robot usage, and sports manipulation); and "money dumping" (disguised fund transfers between accounts). The guide establishes that fraud characterization requires substantial evidentiary elements and cannot rely on mere suspicion. Operators must collect sufficient probative evidence before refusing payouts or account access. For confirmed fraud, the ANJ recommends account closure, with players prohibited from reopening accounts for periods up to six years. Regarding account balances, the guide specifies different treatments depending on fraud type: identity fraud typically results in balance reserves; account hacking requires case-by-case analysis; and gaming fraud may involve prize redistribution to other participants. The ANJ emphasizes that operators retain contractual freedom within legal limits and must clearly specify fraud-related penalties in their terms. Penalty clauses must not be manifestly disproportionate to actual damages, with operators advised to establish absolute value caps alongside percentage-based calculations. The guide includes extensive jurisprudential review demonstrating evidentiary standards courts expect when adjudicating fraud disputes.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

2241 chars · nid 51505

French gambling regulator adopts fraud prevention guide

On June 12, 2026, the Autorité nationale des jeux (ANJ), France's gaming regulator, published a comprehensive guide addressing fraud prevention by gambling operators. The decision establishes detailed procedures and recommendations for identifying, characterizing, and managing fraudulent player activity for gambling offerings requiring players to register online. The guide applies to all online gaming offerings requiring player registration, including competitive gaming, online lotteries, and physical distribution networks with online account requirements. It excludes cases involving money laundering or terrorism financing suspicions, which remain subject to separate financial crime regulations. The ANJ identifies five primary fraud categories: civil identity fraud (including document falsification, identity alteration, identity usurpation, account sharing, and multiple accounts); payment method fraud (including falsified banking documents and unauthorized card use); abusive chargeback disputes; gaming fraud (including poker collusion, robot usage, and sports manipulation); and "money dumping" (disguised fund transfers between accounts). The guide establishes that fraud characterization requires substantial evidentiary elements and cannot rely on mere suspicion. Operators must collect sufficient probative evidence before refusing payouts or account access. For confirmed fraud, the ANJ recommends account closure, with players prohibited from reopening accounts for periods up to six years. Regarding account balances, the guide specifies different treatments depending on fraud type: identity fraud typically results in balance reserves; account hacking requires case-by-case analysis; and gaming fraud may involve prize redistribution to other participants. The ANJ emphasizes that operators retain contractual freedom within legal limits and must clearly specify fraud-related penalties in their terms. Penalty clauses must not be manifestly disproportionate to actual damages, with operators advised to establish absolute value caps alongside percentage-based calculations. The guide includes extensive jurisprudential review demonstrating evidentiary standards courts expect when adjudicating fraud disputes.
3238635 gc Jun 12, 2026 apintea France ANJ (regulator) (check manually) gamblingcompliance
headline rewritten 98% of draft length open

Generated

2145 chars

France's National Gaming Authority Establishes Technical Display Requirements for Gambling Risk Warning Messages

On June 9, 2026, France's Autorité Nationale des Jeux (ANJ) adopted Decision No. 2026-133, establishing technical specifications for displaying mandatory risk warning messages on platforms offering monetised digital gaming objects. The decision implements provisions of Law No. 2024-449 of May 21, 2024, which aims to secure and regulate the digital space. The warning message—"Your gaming activity may be dangerous: money losses, family conflicts, addiction, etc. Find our advice at joueurs-info-service.fr (09 74 75 13 13 - non-premium call)"—must appear in three locations on gaming platforms: the homepage, immediately after user registration, and on pages where players access account management settings. The ANJ specifies precise technical requirements for message display across these locations. On the homepage and account management pages, the message must appear in a contrasting-coloured box occupying at least 10 percent of screen height and the full screen width, remaining fixed and permanently visible without scrolling. The text must use Roboto bold capitals in a colour contrasting with the box background. Following registration, the message appears in a temporary modal box covering at least 30 percent of total screen area, centred both horizontally and vertically, displaying for a minimum of five seconds without user closure capability. A countdown timer indicates remaining display time. During this period, the underlying webpage becomes non-interactive, covered by a dark overlay with minimum 40 percent opacity. In all instances, the message comprises two lines of text, with the government logo either right-aligned or centred at the box bottom within a white rectangle. The entire message box functions as a clickable link directing users to www.joueurs-info-service.fr. The ANJ published this decision on its website on June 12, 2026. Gaming platforms offering monetised digital objects must comply with these technical specifications when displaying mandatory risk warnings to players. REFERENCES: Autorité Nationale des Jeux, Decision No. 2026-133 (June 9, 2026), available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

2109 chars · nid 51504

French gambling regulator adopts display requirements for risk warning messages

On June 12, 2026, France's Autorité Nationale des Jeux (ANJ) published Decision No. 2026-133 of June 9, 2026, establishing technical specifications for displaying mandatory risk warning messages on platforms offering monetisable digital objects. The decision implements provisions of Order of February 4 concerning the warning message on the risks associated with excessive or pathological gambling for games involving monetisable digital items which regulated the content and placement of the message. The warning message — "Your gaming activity may be dangerous: money losses, family conflicts, addiction, etc. Find our advice at joueurs-info-service.fr (09 74 75 13 13 - standard rate call)" — must appear in three locations on gaming platforms: the homepage, immediately after user registration, and on pages where players access account management settings. The ANJ specifies precise technical requirements for message display across these locations. On the homepage and account management pages, the message must appear in a contrasting-coloured box occupying at least 10 percent of screen height and the full screen width, remaining fixed and permanently visible without scrolling. The text must use Roboto bold capitals in a colour contrasting with the box background. Following registration, the message appears in a temporary modal box covering at least 30 percent of total screen area, centred both horizontally and vertically, displaying for a minimum of five seconds without user closure capability. A countdown timer indicates remaining display time. During this period, the underlying webpage becomes non-interactive, covered by a dark overlay with minimum 40 percent opacity. In all instances, the message comprises two lines of text, with the government logo either right-aligned or centred at the box bottom within a white rectangle. The entire message box functions as a clickable link directing users to www.joueurs-info-service.fr . Gaming platforms offering monetised digital objects must comply with these technical specifications when displaying mandatory risk warnings to players.
3232081 pc Jun 11, 2026 ataylor Ontario Ontario Securities Commission financial services
headline rewritten 181% of draft length open

Generated

1735 chars

Ontario Securities Commission Publishes Final Amendments to Principal Distributor Model for Mutual Funds

On June 11, 2026, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), the council of securities regulators across Canada's provinces and territories, published final amendments to the principal distributor model governing the distribution of mutual fund securities. The amendments aim to improve investor protection and maintain investor confidence in Canada's capital markets. A principal distributor is a dealer with an exclusive right or material competitive advantage in distributing mutual fund securities. The CSA clarified that a dealer may act as principal distributor only for mutual funds within the same mutual fund family. However, the amendments do not restrict a principal distributor's ability to also distribute mutual fund securities as a participating dealer to multiple mutual fund families, preserving existing distribution flexibility. The amendments enhance transparency requirements by mandating disclosure of principal distributor arrangements and related compensation across three key documents: the prospectus, the fund facts document, and the annual report on charges and other compensation. These disclosure enhancements ensure investors receive clear information about distributor relationships and associated fees. The CSA coordinates and harmonizes regulation across Canada's provincial and territorial securities regulators to maintain consistent capital market standards. The Ontario Securities Commission (OSC), as the securities regulator for Ontario, participates in this coordinated regulatory framework. The final amendments are now in effect, and market participants distributing mutual fund securities must comply with the new principal distributor requirements and enhanced disclosure obligations.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

3140 chars · nid 93162

Canadian Securities Administrators Publishes Final Amendments to Principal Distributor Model for Mutual Funds

On June 11, 2026, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published final amendments to National Instrument 31-103: Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (NI 31-103), National Instrument 81-101: Mutual Fund Prospectus Disclosure (NI 81-101), National Instrument 81-102: Investment Funds (NI 81-102), and National Instrument 81-105: Mutual Fund Sales Practices (NI 81-105). The amendments clarify that a dealer may only act as a principal distributor for mutual funds in the same mutual fund family. The amendments do not affect the ability of a principal distributor to also distribute mutual fund securities as a participating dealer to multiple mutual fund families. The amendments also enhance transparency by requiring disclosure of principal distributor arrangements and related compensation in the prospectus, fund facts document and the annual report on charges and other compensation. Final notice changes: NI 31-103 (Registration Requirements): The proposed amendments added paragraph 14.17(1)(v), requiring a principal distributor to include a footnote in the annual report on charges and other compensation (ARCC) disclosing the maximum percentage of the management fee paid by the fund manager. In response to comments, the CSA made a non‑material change to clarify that the disclosure must be based on the arrangement between the principal distributor and the manager. The amendments to NI 31-103 come into force on January 1, 2027, with a 24‑month transition period. The changes to Companion Policy 31-103CP also take effect on January 1, 2027. NI 81-101 (Mutual Fund Prospectus Disclosure): The proposed amendments require the simplified prospectus and Fund Facts to disclose the principal distributor’s exclusive right or material competitive advantage and the maximum percentage of the management fee paid to the principal distributor. The CSA adopted these amendments as proposed. They come into force on October 1, 2026, with a 24‑month transition period. NI 81-102 (Investment Funds): The proposed amendments add section 10.2.1, which prohibits a manager from charging a redemption fee based on the sales charge option, effectively banning DSC options for principal distributors. The CSA adopted this amendment as proposed. It comes into force on October 1, 2026, with no transition period. However, section 10.2.1 does not apply to a fee charged under a fee arrangement that existed before June 1, 2022, and the fee arrangement is still in effect. The changes to Companion Policy 81-102CP also take effect on October 1, 2026. NI 81-105 (Mutual Fund Sales Practices): The proposed amendments add section 2.4, limiting a principal distributor to a single mutual fund family, and subsection 4.2(0.1), prohibiting incentives to representatives to recommend one fund over another within the same family. The CSA also repealed section 7.1 (commission rebates for DSC redemptions). The CSA adopted these amendments as proposed. They come into force on October 1, 2026, with a 24‑month transition period. The changes to Companion Policy 81-105CP also take effect on October 1, 2026.
3232802 pc Jun 11, 2026 pdonofrio US Track 3 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission financial services
headline rewritten 56% of draft length open

Generated

1586 chars

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Proposes Rescission of Regulation NMS Rules 611 and 610(e)

On June 11, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed amendments to rescind Rules 611 and 610(e) of Regulation NMS (National Market System). Rule 611 contains the trade-through prohibition for national market system stocks, which prevents trades from executing at prices inferior to better prices displayed in other markets. Rule 610(e) contains restrictions on locking and crossing quotations in national market system stocks. The SEC's proposal would rescind both rules, rescind related defined terms in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS, and make conforming changes to other related provisions. SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins said the proposal aims to simplify market structure and reduce costs for market participants while allowing competition, innovation, and market forces to shape the continuing evolution of equity markets. Atkins noted that after two decades of Rule 611, the SEC is reviewing its unintended consequences, which he said have hindered rather than enhanced long-term market growth. The chairman emphasised the SEC's intention to take a careful, deliberative approach to avoid repeating past mistakes. The public comment period will remain open for 60 days following publication of the proposing release in the Federal Register. Market participants, including equity market exchanges, trading venues, broker-dealers, and institutional investors, should review the proposal and consider submitting comments during this period. The SEC will review all public comments before determining whether to adopt, modify, or withdraw the proposed amendments.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

890 chars · nid 93200

US Securities and Exchange Commission Proposes Rescission of Regulation NMS

On June 11, 2026, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a proposed rule to rescind Rules 611 and 610(e) of Regulation NMS . According to the SEC, the proposed rule is intended to simplify market structure and reduce costs for market participants while allowing competition, innovation and other market forces to shape the continuing evolution of equity markets. Specifically, the proposed rule would: Rescind Rule 611 of Regulation NMS, which contains the trade-through prohibition for national market system stocks. Rescind Rule 610(e) of Regulation NMS, which contains restrictions on locking and crossing quotations in national market system stocks. Rescind related defined terms in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS. Make conforming changes to other related provisions. Interested parties may submit comments on the proposed rule until August 10, 2026 at this link .
3231863 pc Jun 11, 2026 pdonofrio US Track 2 Newsroom - Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) financial services
headline rewritten 62% of draft length open

Generated

1911 chars

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Proposes Reporting Forms for Payment Stablecoin Issuers

On June 11, 2026, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) published OCC Bulletin 2026-24, proposing new information collection requirements for permitted payment stablecoin issuers and foreign payment stablecoin issuers subject to OCC jurisdiction under the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. The OCC is proposing two mandatory reporting forms. The first is a weekly confidential reporting form (OCC Reporting Form PS-01, Payment Stablecoin Activity and Reserve Weekly Reporting) that permitted payment stablecoin issuers must complete for each payment stablecoin it issues. The second is a quarterly reporting form (OCC Reporting Form PS-02, Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer and Foreign Payment Stablecoin Issuer Reports of Condition and Income) that both permitted payment stablecoin issuers and foreign payment stablecoin issuers must submit. These forms are part of the OCC's implementation of the GENIUS Act requirements regarding payment stablecoin issuance and related activities by entities under OCC jurisdiction. The proposal follows the OCC's March 2, 2026 proposed rule implementing GENIUS Act requirements. The reporting forms and instructions aim to provide the OCC with regular oversight data on stablecoin activities and financial condition. The OCC emphasises its commitment to reducing paperwork burden on respondents in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). The public comment period extends 60 days from publication of the information collection in the Federal Register. Interested parties, particularly chief executives of national banks, federal savings associations, and federal branches and agencies, are invited to submit comments. For further information, contact Shaquita Merritt, Clearance Officer, at (202) 649-5490, or David Stankiewicz, Director, Office of Financial Technology, at (202) 649-7299.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1176 chars · nid 93161

US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Proposes Reporting Forms for Payment Stablecoin Issuers

On June 11, 2026, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) proposed new information collection requirements for permitted payment stablecoin issuers (PPSIs) and foreign payment stablecoin issuers (FPSIs) subject to OCC jurisdiction under the GENIUS Act. The OCC is proposing two mandatory reporting forms. The first is a weekly confidential reporting form (OCC Reporting Form PS-01: Payment Stablecoin Activity and Reserve Weekly Reporting) that PPSIs must complete for each payment stablecoin it issues. The second is a quarterly reporting form (OCC Reporting Form PS-02: PPSI and FPSI Reports of Condition and Income) that both PPSIs and FPSIs must submit. These forms are part of the OCC's implementation of the GENIUS Act requirements regarding payment stablecoin issuance and related activities by entities under OCC jurisdiction. The proposal follows the OCC's March 2026 proposed rule implementing GENIUS Act requirements. The reporting forms and instructions aim to provide the OCC with regular oversight data on stablecoin activities and financial condition. Interested parties may submit comments on the proposal until August 10, 2026 at this link .
3232479 pc Jun 11, 2026 pdonofrio US Track 2 Ministry of Finance horizon scanning
headline rewritten 68% of draft length open

Generated

1759 chars

United States Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control Designates Cuban State-Owned Oil Company and Updates Russia Sanctions

On June 11, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced significant updates to its sanctions programmes, including the designation of Cuba's state-owned oil and gas company and modifications to Russia-related sanctions measures. OFAC added Unión Cuba-Petróleo (also known as CUPET), Cuba's state-owned oil and gas enterprise, to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). The entity, established on March 25, 1992, is headquartered in Havana and designated under Executive Order 14404. Simultaneously, OFAC removed two Russian individuals from the SDN List: Sergey Aleksandrovich Maltsev and Olga Borisovna Raykes (also known as Olga Borisovna Raikes), both previously designated under Executive Order 14024 related to secondary sanctions risks. OFAC also updated the SDN List entry for Vend Ore GmbH, an Austrian organisation, to reflect changes in its linked entities. Additionally, OFAC issued two new Russia-related General Licenses: General License 55F, "Authorizing Certain Services Related to Sakhalin-2," and General License 115D, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Existing Civil Nuclear Energy Projects." These licences permit specific transactions that would otherwise be prohibited under existing sanctions. OFAC amended eight Russia-related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs 967, 978, 999, 1011, 1117, 1182, 1203, and 1216) to provide updated guidance on sanctions compliance. Entities subject to U.S. sanctions should review the updated SDN List and General Licences to ensure compliance with current restrictions. Organisations engaged in transactions involving Russia or Cuba should consult the amended FAQs for clarification on permissible activities.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1201 chars · nid 93199

US Office of Foreign Assets Control Designates Cuban State-Owned Oil Company and Updates Russia Sanctions

On June 11, 2026, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced significant updates to its sanctions programs, including the designation of Cuba's state-owned oil and gas company and modifications to Russia-related sanctions measures. OFAC added Unión Cuba-Petróleo (CUPET), Cuba's state-owned oil and gas enterprise, to its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list. Simultaneously, OFAC removed two Russian individuals from the SDN list (Sergey Aleksandrovich Maltsev and Olga Borisovna Raykes), as well as updating the SDN list entry for Vend Ore GmbH, an Austrian organisation, to reflect changes in its Russia-linked entities. Additionally, OFAC issued two new Russia-related general licenses: General License 55F, "Authorizing Certain Services Related to Sakhalin-2", and General License 115D, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Existing Civil Nuclear Energy Projects". These licenses permit specific transactions that would otherwise be prohibited under existing sanctions regimes. OFAC also amended eight Russia-related frequently asked question (FAQ) documents (FAQs 967, 978, 999, 1011, 1117, 1182, 1203 and 1216) to provide updated guidance on sanctions compliance.
3232115 pc Jun 11, 2026 pdonofrio US Track 2 Federal Reserve Board horizon scanning
headline rewritten 89% of draft length open

Generated

1979 chars

Federal Reserve Board Establishes Data Standards for Financial Regulatory Information Collections

On June 11, 2026, the Federal Reserve Board announced a final rule establishing data standards for certain information collections submitted to financial regulatory agencies. The rule has been approved by several other federal financial regulatory agencies in addition to the Board. The final rule establishes data standards for identifiers of legal entities and other data elements to promote interoperability of financial regulatory data across agencies. This standardisation enables more efficient data sharing and coordination among federal financial regulators. The rule reflects feedback received during the public comment period following the proposal issued in August 2024, with modifications made to address stakeholder concerns. The final rule implements provisions of the Financial Data Transparency Act of 2022 (FDTA), which mandates the establishment of consistent data standards across the federal financial regulatory system. By creating uniform standards for data collection and submission, the rule reduces compliance burden on financial institutions that report to multiple regulators and improves the quality and consistency of regulatory data. The standardised approach facilitates better regulatory oversight and coordination among agencies responsible for supervising financial institutions. Financial institutions and other entities subject to information collection requirements from the Federal Reserve Board and other federal financial regulatory agencies should review the final rule to understand the new data standards applicable to their reporting obligations. The rule becomes effective upon publication in the Federal Register. Institutions should ensure their systems and processes comply with the established data standards for legal entity identifiers and related data elements. **References:** - Federal Reserve Board Press Release, June 11, 2026 - Federal Register Notice: Financial Data Transparency Act Joint Data Standards - Board Memo

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1762 chars · nid 93198

US Federal Financial Regulators Announce Final Rule Implementing the Financial Data Transparency Act

On June 11, 2026, US federal financial regulators announced a final rule establishing data standards for certain information collections submitted to these regulators. The rule is part of the implementation of the Financial Data Transparency Act (FDTA), which mandates the establishment of consistent data standards across the federal financial regulatory system.. Specifically, the rule establishes data standards for identifiers of legal entities and other data elements to promote interoperability of financial regulatory data across agencies. According to the regulators, this standardization enables more efficient data sharing and coordination among regulators. By creating uniform standards for data collection and submission, the rule is designed to reduce compliance burdens on financial institutions that report to multiple regulators, as well as to improve the quality and consistency of regulatory data. This standardized approach facilitates better regulatory oversight and coordination among regulators responsible for supervising financial institutions. The rule reflects feedback received during the public comment period following the initially proposed rule issued in August 2024, with modifications made to address stakeholder concerns. The rule takes effect on October 1, 2026 . The regulators jointly issuing the rule are as follows: US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). US Federal Reserve Board (FRB). US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). US National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). US Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). US Department of the Treasury.
3231878 pc Jun 11, 2026 pdonofrio Argentina Ministry of Justice and Human Rights financial services
headline rewritten 93% of draft length open

Generated

1723 chars

Argentina's National Securities Commission Establishes Market Transparency Requirements for Restricted Entities

On June 10, 2026, Argentina's National Securities Commission (CNV) implemented new regulations to strengthen market transparency and integrity by restricting certain entities' trading activities to guaranteed settlement segments. The measure applies to "Restricted Entities," which include: public entities covered under articles 8(a) through 8(d) of Law 24,156 and non-state public entities (excluding state-owned enterprises whose shares trade on CNV-regulated markets); provincial, municipal, and Buenos Aires City entities that would have been classified as national entities under the above criteria; and pension funds and other entities channelling non-state mandatory pension contributions. Financial entities regulated under the Financial Entities Law and the Guarantee Fund for Deposits (FGS) are excluded from these provisions. Under the new framework, securities brokers (ALyCs) and securities agents (ANs) are prohibited from registering Restricted Entities' transactions in unguaranteed bilateral trading segments. All such operations must now occur through guaranteed settlement segments operated by the market or clearing house acting as central counterparty. The regulations establish specific trading protocols designed to enhance transparency, competition, traceability, and fair price formation in securities transactions, prioritising open and competitive trading mechanisms. Roberto E. Silva, CNV president, said the measure aims to strengthen market transparency and integrity by reducing risks associated with irregular practices and ensuring efficient execution under market conditions with minimal market impact. The regulations are established under CNV General Resolution 1,151 (RG N° 1,151).

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1609 chars · nid 93156

Argentine National Securities Commission Establishes Market Transparency Requirements for Restricted Entities

On June 11, 2026, the Argentine National Securities Commission (CNV) issued General Resolution No. 1151, which establishes new provisions aimed at regulating the operations of certain qualified investors that administer public resources or mandatory pension contributions. According to a news release announcing the new resolution, it aims to strengthen market integrity and reduce the risks associated with irregular practices by ensuring these operations are conducted in trading segments that guarantee transparency, competitive market conditions, and efficient execution. Specific provisions of the resolution include, but are not limited to: Prohibiting settlement and clearing agents (ALyCs) and trading agents (ANs) from registering operations for these specific subjects in non-guaranteed bilateral segments. Restricting the execution of these operations exclusively to market segments with settlement guarantees from the market or clearinghouse acting as a central counterparty. Defining a specific category of "restricted subjects", which encompasses national, provincial and municipal public entities, as well as non-state mandatory pension funds. Exempting certain entities from these new provisions, including financial institutions governed by the Financial Entities Law and the Sustainability Guarantee Fund (FGS). Mandating strict trading guidelines designed to maximise standards of transparency, concurrence, traceability and proper price formation. Prioritising open and competitive mechanisms for the negotiation of marketable securities. The resolution takes effect immediately .
3231753 gc Jun 11, 2026 apintea Malta Malta Gaming Authority-news gamblingcompliance
headline rewritten 80% of draft length open

Generated

1675 chars

Malta Gaming Authority Opens Enrolment for Third Environmental, Social, and Governance Code Reporting Cycle

The Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) announced that enrolment is now open for the third cycle of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Code reporting, covering ESG data for the 2025 reporting period. This voluntary initiative continues to support the integration of ESG principles across the online gaming sector in Malta. The 2025 reporting cycle provides licensees with an opportunity to assess and demonstrate their ESG performance, strengthen transparency, and contribute to the continued development of a sustainable and responsible industry. Participation in the ESG Code reporting process enables licensees to demonstrate their commitment to responsible and sustainable business practices; measure, monitor, and enhance their ESG performance; align with evolving industry expectations and recognised ESG standards; and contribute to the ongoing advancement of ESG practices within the sector. The initiative builds on progress achieved in previous reporting cycles and reflects the MGA's commitment to supporting collective progress and reinforcing the sector's commitment to responsible growth. The MGA encourages all eligible licensees to enrol and actively participate in this reporting cycle. Continued engagement from industry stakeholders is essential in supporting the sector's development of sustainable practices. Licensees can enrol in the reporting cycle through the MGA's licensee hub portal. Further information regarding the ESG Code reporting process and enrolment procedures is available on the MGA website. REFERENCES: Malta Gaming Authority. "Enrolment Now Open for the Third ESG Code Reporting Cycle." Accessed via Malta Gaming Authority News.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1348 chars · nid 51481

Malta Gaming Authority opens enrolment for third environmental, social and governance code reporting cycle

On June 11, 2026, the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) announced that enrolment is open for the third cycle of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Code reporting, covering ESG data for the 2025 reporting period. This voluntary initiative continues to support the integration of ESG principles across the online gaming sector in Malta. The 2025 reporting cycle provides licensees with an opportunity to assess and demonstrate their ESG performance, strengthen transparency, and contribute to the continued development of a sustainable and responsible industry. Participation in the ESG Code reporting process enables licensees to demonstrate their commitment to responsible and sustainable business practices; measure, monitor, and enhance their ESG performance; align with evolving industry expectations and recognised ESG standards; and contribute to the ongoing advancement of ESG practices within the sector. The initiative builds on progress achieved in previous reporting cycles and reflects the MGA's commitment to supporting collective progress and reinforcing the sector's commitment to responsible growth. The MGA encourages all eligible licensees to enrol and actively participate in this reporting cycle. Continued engagement from industry stakeholders is essential in supporting the sector's development of sustainable practices.
3231494 gc Jun 11, 2026 prandeo Netherlands News - Dutch Gambling Authority gamblingcompliance
headline rewritten 85% of draft length open

Generated

1430 chars

Netherlands Gambling Authority Fines 711 B.V. €886,000 for Inadequate Player Protection Measures

On an unspecified date, the Dutch Gambling Authority (Kansspelautoriteit) imposed a fine of €886,000 on 711 B.V. for failing to adequately fulfil its duty of care obligations between February 2022 and June 2024. The duty of care requires gambling operators to protect players from gambling addiction. The authority investigated 711's implementation of this obligation by reviewing ten player files of individuals who had incurred significant losses, gambled frequently, and placed bets during nighttime hours. The authority identified breaches in all ten files examined. 711 failed to properly analyse player behaviour and did not implement appropriate intervention measures, allowing gambling activity to escalate unchecked for certain players and resulting in substantial financial losses. Michel Groothuizen, chief executive of the Dutch Gambling Authority, said the authority had observed that not all operators had properly implemented duty of care obligations since the market opened. The authority has consequently conducted additional investigations, which have resulted in multiple duty of care fines. Simultaneously, the authority has strengthened requirements surrounding duty of care to prevent similar violations in future. The operator must comply with the sanction decision, which details the current status of 711 B.V. REFERENCE: Dutch Gambling Authority (Kansspelautoriteit): https://www.kansspelautoriteit.nl/

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1217 chars · nid 51480

Dutch gambling authority fines 711 B.V. €886,000 for player protection failures

On June 11, 2026, the Dutch Gambling Authority (KSA) imposed a fine of €886,000 on 711 B.V. for failing to adequately fulfil its duty of care obligations between February 2022 and June 2024. The duty of care requires gambling operators to protect players from gambling addiction. The authority investigated 711's implementation of this obligation by reviewing ten player files of individuals who had incurred significant losses, gambled frequently, and placed bets during nighttime hours. The authority identified breaches in all ten files examined. 711 failed to properly analyse player behaviour and did not implement appropriate intervention measures, allowing gambling activity to escalate unchecked for certain players and resulting in substantial financial losses. Michel Groothuizen, chief executive of the Dutch Gambling Authority, said the authority had observed that not all operators had properly implemented duty of care obligations since the market opened. The authority has consequently conducted additional investigations, which have resulted in multiple duty of care fines. Simultaneously, the authority has strengthened requirements surrounding duty of care to prevent similar violations in future.
3242675 gc Jun 11, 2026 apintea Ukraine PlayCity Ukraine - Decisions gamblingcompliance
headline rewritten 72% of draft length open

Generated

1437 chars

Ukraine's PlayCity Agency Terminates Online Casino Licence for Limited Liability Company Casino.ua

On June 11, 2026, Ukraine's PlayCity Agency (the national gambling regulator) issued Decision No. 229-Р terminating the online casino operating licence held by limited liability company Casino.ua (TOV "КАЗИНО.ЮА"). The decision revokes Casino.ua's licence to organise and conduct casino gambling activities over the internet. The termination became effective upon publication of the decision on June 11, 2026. The agency published the full decision in PDF format on its official website, making it publicly available to stakeholders and the gambling industry. This licence termination represents a significant enforcement action by Ukraine's gambling regulator against an online casino operator. The decision reflects the PlayCity Agency's ongoing regulatory oversight of the online gambling sector and its authority to revoke operating licences where operators fail to meet regulatory requirements or breach licensing conditions. The specific grounds for the licence termination are contained within the full decision document. Operators and industry participants should note this enforcement action as part of the regulatory landscape for online gambling in Ukraine. The termination of Casino.ua's licence removes it from the list of authorised online casino operators in the jurisdiction. Any players or stakeholders with outstanding matters relating to Casino.ua should take appropriate action in light of this licence revocation.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

1038 chars · nid 51511

Ukrainian gambling regulator terminates online casino licence for Kazino.UA

On June 11, 2026, Ukraine's PlayCity Agency (the national gambling regulator) published Decision No. 229-Р terminating the online casino operating licence held by limited liability company Kazino.UA. The decision reflects the PlayCity Agency's ongoing regulatory oversight of the online gambling sector and its authority to revoke operating licences where operators fail to meet regulatory requirements. The specific grounds for the licence termination are contained within the full decision document and include non-compliance with the prohibition of having connections with a state carrying out armed agresssion against Ukraine. Operators and industry participants should note this enforcement action as part of the regulatory landscape for online gambling in Ukraine. The termination of Kazino.UA's licence removes it from the list of authorised online casino operators in the jurisdiction. Any players or stakeholders with outstanding matters relating to Kazino.UA should take appropriate action in light of this licence revocation.
3231162 pc Jun 11, 2026 csoo Gibraltar Parliament - Bills horizon scanning
headline rewritten 29% of draft length open

Generated

2870 chars

Gibraltar Parliament Enacts Investigatory Powers Act 2026 Establishing Comprehensive Framework for Law Enforcement Communications Interception

On June 10, 2026, Gibraltar's Parliament enacted the Investigatory Powers Act 2026 (the Act), a comprehensive legislative framework governing the use of investigatory powers by law enforcement and public authorities. The Act comes into operation on a date appointed by the Government by notice in the Gibraltar Gazette, with different provisions potentially effective on different dates. The Act establishes a statutory regime for interception of communications, acquisition of communications data, equipment interference, surveillance, covert investigations, and investigation of encrypted data. It creates a structured framework centred on privacy protections, proportionality, and accountability. The legislation designates a competent authority—appointed by the Governor in consultation with the Chief Minister—to grant authorisations for targeted interception, equipment interference, and intrusive surveillance. Intercepting authorities, including the Commissioner of Police and Collector of Customs, may apply for authorisations or grant certain lower-level authorisations themselves. The Act establishes an Investigatory Powers Commissioner, also appointed by the Governor in consultation with the Chief Minister, to oversee the exercise of investigatory powers by public authorities. The Commissioner must keep under review the interception of communications, acquisition of communications data, equipment interference, surveillance, covert investigations, and investigation of encrypted data. The Commissioner must report annually to the Chief Minister and may inform individuals of serious errors affecting them. The Commissioner has powers to investigate, inspect, audit, and require disclosure of documents and information from relevant persons. The Act includes specific safeguards for sensitive information, including items subject to legal privilege, confidential journalistic material, and sources of journalistic information. Additional protections apply when authorisations target Members of Parliament. The legislation creates offences for unlawful interception of communications, unlawful obtaining of communications data, and making unauthorised disclosures. It also establishes monetary penalty regimes for certain unlawful interceptions. The Act provides for combined authorisations enabling multiple investigatory powers to be granted in a single instrument. It includes provisions for urgent authorisations granted by intercepting authorities where immediate action is necessary due to imminent threats to life or security interests, subject to retrospective approval by the competent authority within 24 hours. The legislation applies extraterritorially to persons with close connections to Gibraltar and includes provisions for continued surveillance operations under administrative arrangements with other jurisdictions, including Spain.

Agent draft

Not run yet.

Published

831 chars · nid 93148

Gibraltar's Government Publishes Investigatory Powers Bill 2026

On June 10, 2026, Gibraltar's government published the Investigatory Powers Bill 2026. This Bill introduces legislation to provide law enforcement and other public authorities with investigatory powers such as interception of communication, acquisition of communications data, equipment interference, surveillance and decryption of protected information. The Bill pertains to "relevant crimes" such as  terrorism, fraud, computer-related crime and fraud. This Bill also provides oversight arrangements that strengthen the safeguards that apply to the use of such investigatory powers. The Bill places the key powers on a statutory footing and provides a structured, privacy-centred, proportionate and accountable framework. The legislation is supported by statutory codes of practice one for each of the key investigatory powers.
← Newer 1101–1150 of 2605 Older →