pc
nid 92402
May 05, 2026
ataylor@vixio.com
Canada
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada
horizon scanning
78% of draft length
draft in Generated
Generated
2249 charsCanada's Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre Imposes Administrative Monetary Penalty on VersaBank
On February 23, 2026, the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) imposed an administrative monetary penalty of $42,075 on VersaBank, a bank headquartered in London, Ontario, for committing two serious violations under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and associated Regulations. The penalty has been paid in full and the case is closed.
The first violation involved VersaBank's failure to develop and apply adequate written compliance policies and procedures as required under subsection 9.6(1) of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and paragraph 156(1)(b) of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Regulations. FINTRAC determined that VersaBank inadequately documented policies and procedures relating to the reasonable grounds to suspect threshold for suspicious transaction reports, fraud-related filing requirements, ongoing client monitoring, and prescribed risk assessments. Specifically, the bank's monitoring frequency for elevated and high-risk clients was identical, and its risk assessment policy required completion every three years rather than the mandated two-year requirement.
The second violation concerned VersaBank's failure to take prescribed special measures for high-risk clients under subsection 9.6(3) of the act and section 157 of the Regulations. FINTRAC identified seven instances where VersaBank failed to correctly identify elevated and high-risk clients and apply enhanced due diligence measures. These included three clients incorrectly classified as standard risk despite documented risk factors, three clients with multiple internal control alerts and previous suspicious transaction reports requiring special measures, and one high-risk client lacking required enhanced due diligence.
Both violations were classified as serious violations. The penalty determination considered criteria outlined in section 73.11 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and section 6 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Administrative Monetary Penalties Regulations. The violations were identified during a compliance assessment activity.
Agent draft
Not run yet.
Published
1760 charsFinancial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada Fines VersaBank CAD$42,075 for Anti‑Money Laundering Compliance Failures
On May 5, 2026, the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) announced an administrative monetary penalty against VersaBank, originally imposed on February 23, 2026, for two violations of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA). The violations were identified during a compliance assessment.
Key findings of FINTRAC within the enforcement order include:
Inadequate written AML policies and procedures. VersaBank failed to develop and maintain up‑to‑date written compliance policies and procedures. Specifically, VersaBank did not properly document its threshold for filing suspicious transaction reports, including when fraud was suspected. Additionally, VersaBank failed to meet its ongoing client monitoring requirements, as well as its prescribed risk assessment frequency. VersaBank’s policies stated that it would complete a risk assessment only every three years, whereas regulations require at least every two years.
Failure to apply enhanced due diligence for high‑risk clients. VersaBank failed to correctly identify elevated-risk and high‑risk clients in at least seven instances, and therefore did not apply the required special measures (enhanced due diligence). In three cases, clients were labeled as “standard risk” even though VersaBank had documented heightened risk factors. In three other cases, clients had triggered multiple internal alerts and had previous suspicious transaction reports filed on them, yet VersaBank did not apply enhanced due diligence. VersaBank also failed to identify one client as high‑risk altogether.
Both violations were classified as “serious” under the regulations, with FINTRAC ultimately imposing a CAD$42,075 penalty against VersaBank.