The Michigan DIFS has permanently revoked an insurance license following admission of fraudulent conduct in obtaining the license, which is a clear Licence Revocation enforcement action.
Mandatory inheritance: Licence Revocation is a child of Enforcement, so Enforcement must be raised as the secondary tag.
Product
This regulatory update concerns an enforcement action and license revocation for exam fraud by an insurance agent, which falls outside the Product Type taxonomy scope entirely—the taxonomy covers financial products and services (accounts, loans, investments, payments), not insurance licensing or disciplinary personnel matters.
No secondary product type is applicable; this is a personnel/enforcement matter with no connection to any financial product, service, instrument or proposition in the taxonomy.
Obligation
The update documents a regulatory enforcement action—license revocation—which is a formal disciplinary decision issued by a regulatory authority to a non-compliant firm, fitting the Approval and Certification category as a formal sign-off/certification of a regulatory outcome.
The update also reflects Governance and Oversight elements insofar as the Senior Deputy Director retains ongoing jurisdiction and authority to issue further orders, though this is secondary to the primary enforcement decision itself and requires human review given the confidence threshold.
Activity
This is a regulatory enforcement action concerning license revocation for exam fraud, which does not directly map to any core financial services business activity in the taxonomy; it is an administrative/disciplinary matter rather than an operational business activity.
The fraud element (hiring someone to take an exam fraudulently) could tangentially relate to fraud prevention, but the update is fundamentally about enforcement and license revocation rather than an operational fraud control or detection system.
Themes
The update concerns fraudulent conduct in obtaining an insurance license through exam impersonation, which relates to financial crime and dishonest practices, though the focus is primarily on licensing enforcement rather than retail customer harm.
The licensing revocation and enforcement action reflect conduct-of-business violations and untrustworthiness in the conduct of business, though this is a secondary element to the underlying fraud.
Functions
This is a regulatory enforcement action against an individual insurance agent for exam fraud and license misrepresentation, which does not directly impose operational or compliance obligations on a retail financial services firm's internal functions.
Legal functions may need to monitor this precedent for potential implications around licensing and conduct standards, but the update is primarily an individual enforcement outcome rather than a firm-level regulatory requirement.
2026-08-17 18:43:31·pdonofrio@vixio.com
Meta Id
3410129
Content ID
3418611
GUID
37a53eae9f4c41107a2a43116808176e
Pipeline Progress
🔄 Pipeline Journey
⏱
54s
total
✓
Queued18:42:36
+29s
✓
Metadata18:43:05
+0s
✓
S3 Content18:43:05
+7s
✓
Extracted18:43:12
+3s
✓
LLM Gen18:43:15
+15s
✓
Stored18:43:30
TITLE: Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services Revokes Insurance License for Exam Fraud
BODY:
On August 12, 2026, the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) revoked the insurance license of Ali Shouman following admission of fraudulent conduct in obtaining the license. Joseph Garcia, Senior Deputy Director and General Counsel, issued the Order Accepting Stipulation in Enforcement Case No. 25-18376.
DIFS served Shouman with a Notice of Opportunity to Show Compliance (NOSC) on July 21, 2025, alleging violations under Sections 1239(1)(a) and 1239(1)(g) of the Michigan Insurance Code of 1956 (Code). Shouman admitted to hiring and employing Alicia Jackson to take and pass the online proctored Michigan Life, Accident and Health Producer Exam on Shouman's behalf. This conduct constituted misrepresentation and fraud in obtaining a license, as well as fraudulent and dishonest practices demonstrating untrustworthiness in the conduct of business. The revocation is effective immediately upon entry of the consent order. Shouman is prohibited from reapplying for any license administered by DIFS. Any attempt to do so will constitute a violation of the order and will result in commencement of additional disciplinary proceedings.
Shouman waived the right to a hearing before an administrative law judge and agreed to the consent order following legal review. DIFS staff attorney Diego R. Avila recommended acceptance of the stipulation. The Senior Deputy Director retains jurisdiction over the matter and has authority to issue further orders as deemed appropriate under the Michigan Insurance Code.
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Ali Shouman Enforcement Case No. 25-18376 System ID No. 1273493 Respondent. _____________________________/ Issued and entered on August __1_2_ __, 2026 by Joseph Garcia Senior Deputy Director, and General Counsel ORDER ACCEPTING STIPULATION Based upon the Stipulation to Entry of Order and the files and records of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) in this matter, the Senior Deputy Director finds and concludes that: 1. The Senior Deputy Director has jurisdiction and authority to adopt and issue this Order Accepting Stipulation in this proceeding pursuant to the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act of 1969 (APA), as amended, MCL 24.201 et seq., and the Michigan Insurance Code of 1956 (Code), MCL 500.100 et seq. 2. All required notices have been issued in this case, and the notices and service thereof were appropriate and lawful in all respects. 3. Acceptance of the Stipulation to Entry of Order is reasonable and in the public interest. 4. All applicable provisions of the APA have been either satisfied or waived by all Parties. 5. On or about July 21, 2025, DIFS served a Notice of Opportunity to Show Compliance (NOSC) on Respondent. In the NOSC, DIFS asserted that Respondent provided justification for sanctions pursuant to Sections 1239(1)(a) and 1239(1)(g) of the Code, MCL 500.1239(1)(a) and MCL 500.1239(1)(g). 6. Respondent admits that sanctions are warranted under Section 1239(1)(a) of the Code, MCL 500.1239(1)(a), because Respondent attempted to and did obtain a license through misrepresentation or fraud. 7. Respondent admits that sanctions are warranted under Section 1239(1)(g) of the Code, MCL 500.1239(1)(g), because Respondent used fraudulent or dishonest practices and demonstrated untrustworthiness in the conduct of business. Order Accepting Stipulation Enforcement Case No. 25-18376 Ali Shouman Page 2 of 2 8. The Director is authorized to take disciplinary action against Respondent’s insurance license in addition to the imposition of monetary penalties for the above-described statutory violations pursuant to Sections 1239 and 1244 of the Code, MCL 500.1239 and MCL 500.1244. Now therefore, based upon the Stipulation to Entry of Order and the facts surrounding this case, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 9. All agreements contained in the Stipulation to Entry of Order are accepted and adopted in their entirety. 10. Respondent shall comply with all terms agreed to in the Stipulation to Entry of Order. A failure to comply with a term in the Stipulation shall be deemed a violation of this Order. 11. Respondent’s license is hereby REVOKED, effective immediately. 12. Respondent shall not reapply for a license administered by the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services. Any attempt to do so will constitute a violation of this Order and will result in the commencement of additional proceedings. 13. The Senior Deputy Director retains jurisdiction over the matters contained herein and has the authority to issue such further order(s) as shall be deemed just, necessary, and appropriate in accordance with the Michigan Insurance Code. Failure to abide by the terms and provisions of the Stipulation to Entry of Order and this Order may result in the commencement of additional proceedings. ____________________________________ Joseph A. Garcia Senior Deputy Director, and General Counsel STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES Before the Director of the Department of Insurance and Financial Services In the matter of: Ali Shouman Enforcement Case No. 25-18376 System ID No. 1273493 Respondent. ____________________________/ STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF ORDER Ali Shouman (Respondent) stipulates to the following: 1. Respondent had the opportunity to have this Order Accepting Stipulation and Stipulation to Entry of Order (collectively “Consent Order”) reviewed by legal counsel. 2. Respondent has read and understands this Consent Order. 3. Respondent understands that Respondent has a right to a hearing before an administrative law judge, at which DIFS would be required to prove the charges set forth by presentation of evidence and legal authority and at which Respondent would be entitled to appear, to cross-examine all witnesses presented by DIFS, and to present such testimony or other evidence or legal authority deemed appropriate as a defense to said charges. Respondent understands and intends that by agreeing to the Consent Order, Respondent is knowingly and voluntarily waiving Respondent’s right, pursuant to the Michigan Insurance Code of 1956 (Code), MCL 500.100 et seq., the rules promulgated thereto, and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), MCL 24.201 et seq., to a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. 4. Respondent agrees that all parties have complied with the procedural requirements of the APA and the Code. 5. The Senior Deputy Director retains jurisdiction over the matters contained herein. 6. On or about July 21, 2025, the Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) served Respondent with a Notice of Opportunity to Show Compliance (NOSC) alleging that Respondent committed conduct warranting disciplinary action against Respondent’s license and monetary penalties pursuant to Sections 1239 and 1244 of the Code, MCL 500.1239 and MCL 500.1244. 7. Respondent admits to hiring and employing Alicia Jackson to take and pass the online proctored MI Life, Accident and Health Producer Exam on Respondent’s behalf, justifying sanctions under Sections 1239(1)(a), 1239(1)(g), and 1244 of the Code. 8. Respondent agrees that, in lieu of further disciplinary action, Respondent’s license shall be revoked, effective immediately upon entry of the Consent Order. Stipulation to Entry of Order Enforcement Case No. 25-18376 Ali Shouman Page 2 of 2 9. Respondent shall not seek another license administered by DIFS. Any attempt to do so will constitute a violation of this Stipulation and will result in the commencement of additional disciplinary proceedings. 10. Both parties consent to entry of the Consent Order upon its approval by the Senior Deputy Director. 11. Respondent understands that this Consent Order will be presented to the Senior Deputy Director for approval and that the Senior Deputy Director may or may not approve and adopt it. Respondent further agrees that the Senior Deputy Director has jurisdiction and authority to approve and adopt this Consent Order. 12. Respondent waives any objection to the Director deciding this case following a Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules hearing in the event that the Consent Order is not approved. ___________________________________ __________________________ Ali Shouman, Respondent Date DIFS Staff approve this Stipulation and recommend that the Senior Deputy Director accept it and issue an Order Accepting Stipulation. __________________________ _8_-_1_2_-_2_0_2__6_ _______________ Diego R. Avila (P72657) Date DIFS Staff Attorney